2013 Supreme(Raj) 1924
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT AT JAIPUR BENCH
Sangeet Lodha, J.
Tarun Kumar Khatri - Appellant
Versus
Ajmer Vidhyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. and Another - Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8174 of 2009.
Decided On : 4-10-2013
For the Respondents:Mr. Siddharth Tatia on behalf of Mr. Ravi Bhansali, Advocates.
Termination of service of a probationer on the ground of misconduct without holding a regular inquiry is violative of the principles of natural justice.
Headnote:
EMPLOYMENT - TERMINATION OF SERVICE - MISCONDUCT - NATURAL JUSTICE - INDIAN ELECTRICITY ACT, 2003 - SECTIONS 135, 136, 150 - AJMER VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED EMPLOYEES (CCA) REGULATIONS, 1962 - REGULATION 28(I) - Termination of service of a probationer on the ground of misconduct without holding a regular inquiry is violative of the principles of natural justice.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, a probationer trainee in AVVNL, was arrested for his alleged involvement in a case of electricity theft. The respondent terminated his services, citing the incident as misconduct under Regulation 28(i) of the AVVNL Employees (CCA) Regulations, 1962.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that the termination order was punitive in nature as it was based on the misconduct alleged against the petitioner. It further held that the termination of service without a regular inquiry into the misconduct allegations violated the principles of natural justice.
Issues: 1. Whether the termination of service order was punitive in nature? 2. Whether the termination of service without a regular inquiry into the misconduct allegations violated the principles of natural justice?
Ratio Decidendi: 1. The court relied on the settled law that a probationer is entitled to certain protections and his services cannot be terminated arbitrarily or in a punitive manner without complying with the principles of natural justice. 2. The court held that the order impugned was stigmatic and punitive as it specifically mentioned the petitioner's involvement in the electricity theft case and treated it as misconduct under Regulation 28(i) of the Regulations, 1976.
Final Decision: The court allowed the writ petition and quashed the termination order. However, it granted liberty to the respondents to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law.
1. This writ petition is directed against the order dated 27.03.2008 issued by the Secretary (Admn.), Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited (`AVVNL'), Ajmer, whereby the service of the petitioner, holding the post of Junior Engineer-II as Probationer Trainee, stand terminated.
"Sh. Tarun Kumar Khatri, JEN-II-Probationer Trainee O/O the Assistant Engineer, AVVNL, Merta, has been arrested by the Dy.S.P.(Vig.), AVVNL, Ajmer on Dated 25.03.08 in the case of issue of Nigam's material illegally and in connivance with consumer helped in theft of electricity, and case under Section 135/136 & 150 of Indian Electricity Act-2003 was registered against him and was remained in judicial custody from 25-03-08 to 26-03-08 and Criminal Offence against him, is under investigation.
Sh. Tarun Kumar Khatri S/o Sh. Khushal Chand Khatri, was appointed as JEN-II-Probationer Trainee for a period of 2 years vide order No. 05/D.69 Dated 04,04.07 and whereas a criminal case has been registered against the said official by APTP Thana, Nagaur for the aforesaid theft of electricity in connivance with consumer and issue of material illegally. In view of