SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Raj) 1095

J.K.RANKA
Saroj – Appellant
Versus
Hazarilal – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants:Ram Sharan Sharma, Advocate.
For the Respondents:Lokesh Atery, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

1. -The instant civil misc. appeal has been filed by the claimant-appellant under section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, for enhancement of the impugned award dated 27.01.2009 passed by the MACT (Fast Track), Kotputli, District, Jaipur in claim case No. 704/2008, whereby the claimant-appellants have been awarded compensation of Rs. 4,40,000.

2. The brief facts emerging from the face of the record are that a claim petition was filed before the tribunal u/s 166/140 of the M.V. Act on 26.06.2006 against the driver of the truck Hazari Lal (non-claimant no. 1), the owner of the truck Sureshchand (non-claimant no. 2), and the insurance company The New India Insurance Company Ltd. (non-claimant no. 3) praying therein to pay the claimants an amount of Rs. 68,45,000 as compensation on account of road accident, which took place on 29.04.2006, at about 1 p.m., when deceased Girdharilal was standing at the Kotputli intersection in order to cross the road at that time a truck bearing No. HRJ-55J-0047 coming from Jaipur, and was being driven in rash and negligent manner by driver Ram Sharan, firstly hit a camel-cart and thereafter crushed Girdharilal, as a result of which Girdharil

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top