SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Raj) 1531

SANDEEP MEHTA
Balbir Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Himachal Road Transport Corp. Anr. – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants:Vishal Singhal, Advocate.
For the Respondents:M.P. Goswami, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

1. - The misc. appeal for enhancement has been filed by the claimants, the legal heirs of the deceased Paramjeet Singh under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act (for short hereinafter called; "the Act") against the award dated 7.8.2001 passed by the M.A.C.T., Sri Karanpur in Claim Case No. 90/1997 whereby the claim application filed by the appellants under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act was partly allowed and they were granted compensation to the tune of Rs. 2,25,000 on account of death of Shri Paramjeet Singh in a road accident.

2. Facts in brief are that husband of the appellant No. 1 late Shri Paramjeet Singh aged 25 years was going on a Maruta (Jugar) near the Chak 7 EEA on 20.6.1996 in the night at about 8 O'clock. It is alleged that a Bus No. HP 38/2454 owned by Himachal Pradesh Road Transport Corporation being driven in a rash and negligent fashion by its driver Girdharilal collided with the Maruta. Paramjeet expired at the spot due to the injuries received in the accident.

3. The claimants filed a claim application as stated above under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act which was partly allowed holding the driver of the Roadways bus responsible for causi




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top