SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Raj) 1838

GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS
United India Insurance Company Ltd. , Chittorgarh – Appellant
Versus
Rameshwar Lal @ Rameshchandar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant:U.C.S. Singhvi, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

1. - The instant appeal has been filed by the The instant appeal ha been filed by the appellant-Insurance Company under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the award dated 01.04.2009. passed by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Chittorgarh and prayed that the award impugned against the appellant may be quashed

2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Insurance Company submits that while deciding issue No. 1, the Claim Tribunal gave finding that Insurance Company is not liable to pay the compensation and the owner of the truck is held respondents for compensation but the Insurance Company has been directed to first pall the amount of compensation to claimants, then, recover the amount of compensation from the truck owner.

3. Learned counsel for the appellant-Insurance Company vehemently argued that as per fact, a cheque was issued on 29.11.2003. by the truck owner, upon which the cover-note was issued for insuring the vehicle in question, but on 08.12.2003. the cheque for premium given by the truck owner was dishonoured by the bank and therefore, a letter was dispatched to the truck owner the by Insurance Company on 09.12.2003. stating therein that his vehi






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top