SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Raj) 1078

Y.R.MEENA, V.K.SINGHAL
Commissioner of Income – Appellant
Versus
Lake Palace Hotels and Motels Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. - This order shall dispose of all the above listed matters which have been referred by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal under section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for opinion of this court since the controversy involved in the above cases is as to whether a cinema building or hotel building is plant or not for the purpose of claiming depreciation.

2. In the case of Lake Palace Hotels and Motels Pvt. Ltd., the Income- tax Appellate Tribunal has referred the following question of law arising out of its order dated September 2, 1988, in respect of the assessment year 1983-84 under section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

"Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the learned members of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal were justified in holding that hotel is to be treated as plant and accordingly depreciation should be allowed at the rate applicable to a plant, and in further holding that the hotel being run 24 hours a day is also eligible to extra shift allowance on the basis of its being a plant ?"

3. The facts of this case relevant for the purpose of decision on the above question of law are that the assessee is a private limited company and is












































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top