Y.R.MEENA, V.K.SINGHAL
Commissioner of Income – Appellant
Versus
Lake Palace Hotels and Motels Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
"Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the learned members of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal were justified in holding that hotel is to be treated as plant and accordingly depreciation should be allowed at the rate applicable to a plant, and in further holding that the hotel being run 24 hours a day is also eligible to extra shift allowance on the basis of its being a plant ?"
CIT v. Alps Theatre (1967) 65 ITR 377 (SC) = AIR 1967 SC 1437
CIT v. Hotel Ayodya (1993) 201 ITR 1002
CIT v. R.G. Ispat Ltd. (1994) 210 ITR 1018 (Raj)
CIT v. S.P. Jaiswal Estates (P.) Ltd. (1992) 196 ITR 179
CIT v. Taj Mahal Hotel (1971) 82 ITR 44 (SC)
CIT v. U.P. Hotel Restaurant Ltd. (1980) 123 ITR 626
CIT v. Yamuna Cold Storage (1981) 129 ITR 728
IRC v. Scottish and New Castle Breweries Ltd. (1982) 2 All ER 230: (1982) 1 WLR 322 (HL)
K. Kungu Govindan v. Parakkat Kunhilekshmi Amma AIR 1966 Ker 244
Karnani Properties Ltd. v. Miss Augustine AIR 1957 SC 309
Mohd. Jaffer Ali v. S. Rajeswara Rao AIR 1971 AP 156
S.K Tulsi and Sons v. CIT (1991) 187 ITR 685 (All)
S.P. Jaiswal Estates Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT (No. 2) (1994) 209 ITR 307
Santosh Enterprises v. CIT (1993) 200 ITR 353
Scientific Engineering House P. Ltd. v. CIT (1986) 157 ITR 86 (SC)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.