SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Raj) 1240

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT AT JAIPUR BENCH
R.S.Chauhan, Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, JJ.
Naval Kishore & Anr. - Appellants
Versus
State of Rajasthan - Respondent
D.B. Criminal Death Reference No. 2 of 2014.
Decided On : 19-01-2015

For the Appellant:Biri Singh, Senior Advocate with Rajesh Choudhary, Naval Kishore and Mohar Pal Meena, Advocates.
For the Respondent: N.S. Dhakad, Public Prosecutor.

In cases of murder, the court must consider mitigating circumstances, such as the accused's young age, first offense, absence of premeditation or planning, and lack of evidence of depravity or cold-blooded murder, in determining whether the death penalty is an appropriate sentence.

Headnote:

CRIMINAL LAW - MURDER - SENTENCING - DEATH PENALTY - MITIGATING CIRCUMSTANCES - REFORMATION AND REHABILITATION - YOUNG AGE OF THE ACCUSED - FIRST OFFENSE - ABSENCE OF PREMEDITATION OR PLANNING - LACK OF EVIDENCE OF DEPRAVITY OR COLD BLOODED MURDER - SENTENCE REDUCED TO LIFE IMPRISONMENT.

Fact of the Case:

The accused, Raju, was convicted of murder and sentenced to death for mowing down passengers with a bus, resulting in the deaths of six people and injuries to eleven others. The incident occurred after an altercation between Raju and the passengers over bus fare.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the accused was a young man of twenty-seven years old at the time of the incident, with no prior criminal record. The court also found that the incident was not premeditated or planned, but rather occurred in the heat of the moment during an altercation. Furthermore, the court found no evidence of depravity or cold-blooded murder.

Issues: Whether the death penalty was an appropriate sentence in this case, considering the mitigating circumstances of the accused's young age, first offense, absence of premeditation or planning, and lack of evidence of depravity or cold-blooded murder.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the death penalty was not an appropriate sentence in this case, given the mitigating circumstances. The court found that the accused was a young man with no prior criminal record, that the incident was not premeditated or planned, and that there was no evidence of depravity or cold-blooded murder. The court also considered the possibility of reformation and rehabilitation of the accused.

Final Decision: The court reduced the accused's sentence from death to life imprisonment.

JUDGMENT

1. - The Additional Sessions Judge, Karauli has made a reference, being D.B. Criminal Death Reference No.2/2014, for confirming the death sentence awarded to the accused, Raju, by judgment dated 11.12.2014. By the said judgment the learned Judge has convicted the appellant, Raju, for offences under Sections 302, 307 and 323 IPC. By an order of even date, the learned Judge has sentenced him as under:-

U/s. 302 IPC: Death sentence, imposed with a fine of Rs. 1 Lac, and directed to further undergo simple imprisonment of two months, in default thereof.

U/s. 307 IPC: Ten years of rigorous imprisonment, imposed with a fine of Rs. 50,000/-, and directed to further undergo simple imprisonment of one month, in default thereof.

U/s. 323 IPC: One year of rigorous imprisonment.

2. By the same judgment dated 11.12.2014, the learned Judge has also convicted another co-accused, namely Naval Kishore, for offences under Sections 302/34, 307/34 and 323/34 IPC, and sentenced him as under:-

U/s. 302/34 IPC: Life imprisonment, imposed with a fine of Rs. 1 Lac, and directed to further undergo simple imprisonment of two months, in default thereof.

U/s. 307/34 IPC: Ten years of rigorous imprisonment, imposed with a fine of Rs. 50,000/-, and directed to further undergo simple imprisonment of one month, in default thereof.

U/s. 323/34 IPC: One year of rigorous imprisonment.

3. Aggrieved by the aforesaid judgment dated 11.12.2014, Raju has filed a regular appeal, namely D.B. Criminal Appeal No.23/2015, and a Jail appeal, namely D.B. Criminal (Jail) Appeal No.63/2015, before this court. Similarly, aggrieved by the same judgment, Naval Kishore has preferred an appeal, namely D.B. Criminal Appeal No.22/2015, before this court. Since the Criminal Death Reference, and the three criminal appeals filed by the accused persons challenge the same impugned judgment, therefore, they are being decided by this common judgment.

4. Briefly, the case of the prosecution is that on 5.10.2011, Jitesh (P.W. 4) submitted a written report (Ex.P. 3) before the Police Station Kotwali, Karauli which when translated into English reads as under:-

To,

The SHO,

Police Station Karauli Kotwali,

District Karauli.

Sir,

It is humbly submitted that on 4.10.2011 around 7:20 PM, I, my elder brother, Rahul, aged 22 years, both my sisters, Shalu, 14 years, and Madhuri, 16 years, and my grand-father, Manohar Singh, boarded a train from Agra Fort for the purpose of paying our homage to Kaila Devi. Around 1:30 AM, at night, we got down at the Hindon Station. There a person was soliciting passengers for taking them by bus to the temple of Kaila Devi. I asked him about the ticket fare. He told me that for the devotees of Kaila Devi, the service is free. He not only asked us, but also asked a lot of other persons from Agra to sit in the bus. We sat in a bus bearing registration No. RJ14-PB-9020. There were about 70-80 passengers in the bus. The bus driver started the bus. On Dholpur Road, before reaching Karauli, the bus driver stopped the bus in a jungle and asked all of us to pay the passenger fare. He took Rs. 40/- from each one of us. We also asked him as to why he is robbing us like this. There was no conductor in the bus. He brought the bus to Karauli and at Hathi Ghata Petrol Pump he told all of us to get down from the bus. One of the passengers slapped the driver as the bus driver refused to take us any further. But subsequently, we got down from the bus and started to walk. We were divided in small groups and were walking on the side of the road. With an intention to kill us, the bus driver hit us with the bus. Whomever he could find, he hit the persons with the bus. This incident had occurred at 4:00 O'clock in the morning. In this incident, my brother, Rahul, Sindhi S/o. Sheetal, r/o. Barah Khamba, Agra, and four other persons died on the spot. Moreover, Bantu S/o. Vijay, Malna W/o. Vijay, r/o. Asat Gali, Tajganj, Agra, Narendra S/o. Man Singh Eta Wale, r/o. Near Bus Stand, Bijli Ghar, Agra, L























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top