SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Raj) 808

J.S.VERMA, G.M.LODHA, V.S.DAVE
Metharam Lekhumal – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Income – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. - This is a reference under section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (" the Act "), at the instance of the assessee for the decision by this court of the following questions of law, namely:

"1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in holding that the assessee-firm was not entitled to registration for the assessment year 1972-73 and continuation of registration for the assessment year 1973-74 due to non-specification of shares in losses in the partnership deed dated October 30, 1971 ?

2. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in holding that shares in losses were not specified in the partnership deed dated October 30, 1971 ? "

2. This reference initially came up for hearing before a Division Bench when it was indicated at the hearing that a Division Bench decision of this court in Raj Construction Co. v. Addl. CIT [1986] 157 ITR 734 , does not appear to be in consonance with the Supreme Court decision in Mandyala Govindu & Co. v. CIT [1976] 102 ITR 1 . For this reason, the Division Bench referred the matter for decision by a larger Bench. This is how the reference has come up

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top