RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT AT JAIPUR BENCH
Veerendr Singh Siradhana, J.
Jaswant Singh Parakh - Appellant
Versus
Bank of Baroda and Ors. - Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16826 of 2012.
Decided On : 14-12-2015
The petitioner, who had served the respondent-Bank since 1945 to 1967 at Ajmer, and declined to continue in the service with the respondent-Bank for he was transferred to Indore as well as in view of all the correspondence with reference to his claim for ex-gratia relief a part of cause of action did arise in the District of Ajmer, and therefore, this Court has the territorial jurisdiction to entertain the writ petition.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, who had served the respondent-Bank since 1945 to 1967 at Ajmer, and declined to continue in the service with the respondent-Bank for he was transferred to Indore as well as in view of all the correspondence with reference to his claim for ex-gratia relief a part of cause of action did arise in the District of Ajmer, and therefore, this Court has the territorial jurisdiction to entertain the writ petition.
Finding of the Court:
The petitioner, who had served the respondent-Bank since 1945 to 1967 at Ajmer, and declined to continue in the service with the respondent-Bank for he was transferred to Indore as well as in view of all the correspondence with reference to his claim for ex-gratia relief a part of cause of action did arise in the District of Ajmer, and therefore, this Court has the territorial jurisdiction to entertain the writ petition.
Issues: Whether the petitioner is entitled to receive ex-gratia relief under circular dated 22nd December, 1998; Whether the petitioner's resignation from the service amounts to voluntary retirement; Whether the petitioner is entitled to pensionary benefits under the Bank of Baroda (Employees) Pension Regulations, 1995.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the petitioner was not entitled to receive ex-gratia relief under circular dated 22nd December, 1998, as he had resigned from the service and was not eligible for pensionary benefits under the Bank of Baroda (Employees) Pension Regulations, 1995. The court further held that the petitioner's resignation from the service did not amount to voluntary retirement, as it was not accepted by the appointing authority.
Final Decision: The writ petition was dismissed.
"(i) To issue an appropriate writ/order/direction quashing and setting aside the order dated 7.5.2012.
(ii) To issue an appropriate writ/order/direction holding that petitioner entitled is entitled to receive exgratia relief along with all it's arrears with interest @ 18% p.a.
(iii) To issue an appropriate writ/order/direction directing the respondents to grant all other reliefs to the petitioner which are admissible to retired employees of the Respondent Bank.
(iv) Any other relief which this Hon'ble Court deem fit and proper in facts and circumstances of the case may also be passed in favour of petitioner.
(v) Award cost of petition."
Chennai Metropolitan Water Supply and Sewerage Board v. T.T. Murali Babu (2014) 4 SCC 108
Kusum Ingots and Alloys Ltd. v. Union of India (2004) 6 SCC 254
M.R. Prabhakar v. Canara Bank (2012) 9 SCC 671
Mineral Exploration Corporation Limited v. Arvind Kumar Dixit (2015) 2 SCC 535
National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Kirpal Singh (2014) 5 SCC 189
Natural Gas Commission v. Utpal Kumar Basu (1994) 4 SCC 711
Nawal Kishore Sharma v. Union of India (2014) 9 SCC 329
Om Prakash Srivastava v. Union of India (2006) 6 SCC 207
Prof. A. Marx v. Government of Tamil Nadu (2014) 13 SCC 329
Rajendran Chingaravelu v. R.K. Mishra
Reserve Bank of India v. Cecil Dennis Solomon (2004) 9 SCC 461
Sheel Kumar Jain v. New India Assurance Company Limited 2011 (12) SCC 197
Shyam Babu Verma v. Union of India (1994) 2 SCC 521
State of M.P. v. Yogendra Shrivastava (2010) 12 SCC 538
State of Rajasthan v. Swaika Properties (1985) 3 SCC 217
State of Tripura v. Arabinda Chakraborty (2014) 6 SCC 460
State of Uttar Pradesh v. Arvind Kumar Srivastava (2015) 1 SCC 347
Sudhir Kumar Counsel v. Allahabad Bank (2011) 3 SCC 486
UCO Bank v. Sanwar Mal (2004) 4 SCC 412
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.