N.M.KASLIWAL, S.N.BHARGAVA
Additional Commissioner Of Income – Appellant
Versus
Ganeshilal Lal Chand – Respondent
"1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in holding that the reopening of the assessment under section 147(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, was not valid ?
2. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in holding that the previous year in respect of the income from undisclosed sources would be financial year and not the accounting year of the assessee ?
3. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in deleting the addition of Rs. 26,000 from the total income of the assessee for the assessment year 1956-57 and Rs. 15,600 from the total income of the assessee for the assessment year 1957-58 ?
4. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in cancelling the penalties levied under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for the assessment years 1956-57 and 1957-58 ? "
Chhugamal Rajpal v. S.P. Chaliha (1971) 79 ITR 603 (SC)
CIT v. Burlop Dealers Ltd. (1971) 79 ITR 609 (SC)
Gemini Leather Stores v. ITO (1975) 100 ITR 1 (SC)
General Mrigendra Shum Sher Jung Bahadur Rana v. ITO (1980) 123 ITR 329 (Delhi)
Indian and Eastern Newspaper Society v. CIT (1979) 119 ITR 996 (SC)
Parashuram Pottery Works Co. Ltd. v. ITO (1977) 106 ITR 1 (SC)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.