D.M.BHANDARI, G.M.MEHTA
R. B. Seth Moolchand – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Income – Respondent
"(1) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the prospecting licence fee of Rs. 3,200 is allowable as revenue expenditure?
(2) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the appropriate part of Rs. 1,53,800 was allowable as revenue expenditure?"
The applicant before the Tribunal, R.B. Seth Moolchand Suganchand (Mining Department), Udaipur, hereinafter referred to as the assessee, was working certain emerald mines in the Udaipur area where the head office was situated. The relevant assessment year under reference was 1952-53. At the head office of the assessee, the accounts are closed on October 31, 1951, and at the branch on March 31, 1952, and those are the relevant previous years. During the relevant year, the assessee applied for certain new licences, for which it incurred an expenditure of Rs. 5,694 which included prospecting licence fee of Rs
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.