1. All the above mentioned appeals shall stand decided by this common order and judgment as they have been filed against the same impugned decree and judgment dated 26.10.2012 passed by Additional District Judge No. 3, Udaipur, vide which the Trial Court rejected the objection petitions filed by the appellants under Order XXI, Rule 97 and 99 rent with Section 151 of the C.P.C. on the application of the plaintiff-decree holder filed under Section 11 and Order VII, Rule 11 read with Section 151 of the C.P.C.

2. The facts in short are that the respondent-decree holder had filed a suit for declaration and possession against the State of Rajasthan on 16.02.1978, in which it was stated that on the merger of the Mewar with the State of Rajasthan, a list of private properties of the Ruler of Mewar was prepared. The same was approved by the Government of India. Accordingly, the then Ruler of Mewar, the plaintiff decree-holder was held to be the owner of the property named as Devasthan Ki Kachahari. The said property was held to be part of the City Palace. On account of lack of space, the State of Rajasthan requested the respondent-decree holder to allow them to keep the possession