SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Raj) 900

JAGDISH BHALLA, MOHAMMAD RAFIQ
V. K. Gaur – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
V.K. Gaur, Appellant Present-in-Person;
None present for Respondents

JUDGMENT

Hon'ble RAFIQ, J.—This appeal is directed against judgment of learned Single Judge dated 14.3.2005 dismissing thereby writ petition filed by petitioner-appellant. In writ petition, petitioner-appellant had challenged order dated 24.10.1992 by which penalty of stoppage of two annual grade increments without cumulative effect, was awarded to him and order dated 17.5.1994 vide which appeal filed by him against aforesaid order of penalty, was dismissed.

2. Appellant V.K. Gaur has appeared in person to argue his matter whereas no one has appeared from the side of respondents to oppose the appeal. The matter was nevertheless considered on its merits taking into account the arguments raised before learned Single Judge as well.

3. Shri V.K. Gaur, the appellant has argued that learned Single Judge erred in law in holding that opportunity of hearing envisaged in Rule 17(1)(c) of the Rajasthan Civil Services (Classification, Control & Appeal) Rules, 1958 (for short, `the CCA Rules'), cannot be claimed as a matter of right and it is left to discretion of disciplinary authority whether or not to grant such opportunity even if demanded by delinquent. It was contended that in present case,































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top