SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Raj) 254

S.S.KOTHARI
Rajendra Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Parasram – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
Ramrakh Sharma, for Appellants;
Mahendra Goyal, for Respondent

Hon'ble KOTHARI, J.—The plaintiff (respondent) filed a suit against the defendants (appellants) for ejectment of Shop No.46 situated in Jawahar Market, Kota and arrear of rents alleging that he purchased it on 04.06.1991 through a registered sale deed. At that time, Ratan Lal, the father of the defendants, was a tenant in the shop on a monthly rent of Rs.250/-. The plaintiff and erstwhile owner of the shop, Bishan Lal, informed Ratan Lal that the shop has been sold to the plaintiff and he has become the owner of the shop. Even thereafter Ratan Lal did not pay the rent of the shop to the plaintiff. After the death of Ratan Lal, the defendants are in possession of the shop. The defendants have committed default by not paying rent since June 1991. The plaintiff is an educated unemployed young man and the said shop is needed by him for starting a readymade garment business. He has no other shop for conducting business. Thus, the shop is a bonafide and reasonable need of the plaintiff for his own personal use. He sent registered notices for vacating the shop to the defendants through his counsel but they were returned with the endorsements of refusal. The defendants have other shops sit




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top