R.S.CHAUHAN
Suresh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
2. Being taken from S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No.333/2011, the brief facts are that on 19.02.2009 the Parchabayan of Sheeshram, respondent No.2, was recorded by the police. In his Parchabayan, Sheeshram claimed that on 18.02.2009, while he was returning from the village Deda Ki Dhani, along with his nephew, he was assaulted by Rakesh Jat, Suresh Jat, Pradeep, Chidia and by two or four other persons, whose names he does not know. According to him, he was first assaulted by Pradeep and Rakesh and subsequently by others. According to him, these persons were armed with Lathies and Barchi. He further claimed that his nephew, Dilip, called up Dharmveer, who came there in his vehicle. He further alleged that he has suffered injuries on different parts of his body. Due to nervousness and anxiety, he cannot reveal as to who assaulted him at specific part
Krishnappa vs. State of Karnataka ((2004) 7 SCC 792) 3
Ram Singh & Ors. vs. Ram Niwas & Anr. ((2009) 14 SCC 25) 3
Sarabjit Singh & Anr. vs. State of Punjab 7 Anr. ((2009) 16 SCC 46) 3
Lal Suraj alias Suraj Singh & Anr. vs. State of Jharkhand ((2009) 2 SCC 696) 3
Brindaban Das & Ors. vs. State of West Bengal ((2009) 3 SCC 329 = 2009(2) RLW 1727 (SC)) 3
Inder Mohan Goswami & Anr. vs. State of Uttaranchal & Ors. (AIR 2008 SC 251) 3
Union of India vs. Prafulla Kumar Samal & Anr. ((1979) 3 SCC 4) 8
Dilawar Balu Kurane vs. State of Maharashtra ((2002) 2 SCC 135 = RLW 2002(1) SC 157) 8
Kailash vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr. ((2008) 14 SCC 51) 11
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.