[Citation : 2011(4) RLW 3531 (Raj.)]
(Rajasthan High Court)
Jaipur Bench
Mool Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (Rafiq, J.)
HON'BLE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ, J.
Mool Singh
Versus
State of Rajasthan & Ors.
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3444 of 1989, decided on 25.04.2011
Writ petition dismissed.
jktLFkku d`f"k tksrksa ij vf/kdre gncUnh vf/kfu;e] 1973] /kkjk 15] 40 & lhfyax dh dk;Zokgh iqu% vkjEHk djuk & Hkwfe dks vf/k'ks"k@vf/kd Bgjkrs gq, csn[ky djus ds vkns'k fn;s & u rks lquokbZ dk volj fn;k x;k vkSj u gh /kkjk 12¼2½ ,oa 13 ds rgr uksfVl fn;k x;k & mi[k.M vf/kdkjh dh l{kerk & vfHkfu/kkZfjr & vf/klwfpr frfFk ds ckn fMØh gkfly dh ftl ij fdlh O;fDr dh Hkwfe ds vf/k'ks"k {ks= ds vo/kkj.k gsrq fopkj ugha fd;k tk ldrk & bl dk;Zokgh dks pqukSrh nsus gsrq Lo;a izkFkhZ dks dksbZ Lora= vf/kdkj ugha Fkk & vf/kfu;e ds izko/kkuksa dks foQy djus ds vk'k; ls fMØh gkfly dh xbZ Fkh & uSlfxZd U;k; ds fl)kUrksa dh vuqikyuk lacaf/kr izdj.kksa ds rF;ksa ij fuHkZj djrh gS &jkT ljdkj ds vkns'k ls /kkjk 15¼2½ ds rgr dk;Zokgh iqu% vkjEHk dh xbZ Fkh tks fd loksZPp U;k;ky; rd vfUrerk vftZr dj pqdh Fkh & bls izkFkhZ dh izsj.kk ij ;kfpdk esa lEHkor;k 1989 esa foyfEcr voLFkk esa ugha [kksyk tk ldrk FkkA ¼in la[;k 12 ls 19½ ;kfpdk [kkfjt dhA
2. Factual matrix of the case is that one Bhanu Pratap Singh, former-Jagirdar of Dudu of Jaipur District died on 21/5/1966. He was survived by his mother Smt.Rasal Kunwar, adopted son Kuldeep Singh and adopted daughter Jayendra Kumari, who are successors of Bhanu Pratap Singh according to Hindu Succession Act. Smt.Rasal Kunwar, widow of late Shri Jawan Singh and mother of Shri Bhanu Pratap Singh filed a suit for declaration before the Sub Divisional Officer Sambharlake. Said suit was decreed on 1/12/1971 and all the above referred to three legal heirs were held entitled to receive 1/3rd share each of the disputed land. The S.D.O. Sambharlake decided the ceiling case No.24/1971 on 6/12/1971 under Chapter-IIIB of the Act of 1955 and allowed all the above referred to three legal heirs entitled to retain 30 standard acres of land as independent unit and remaining land was declared surplus. It is claimed by petitioner that Smt.Rasal Kunwar executed a gift deed of her 1/3rd share (30 acres of land) in his favour on 9/4/1973. She also executed a Will in his favour on 18/12/1971 before coming into force the Act of 1973 w.e.f. 1/1/1973. The S.D.O. Sambharlake initiated fresh proceedings only against Kuldeep Singh, adopted son of Bhanu Pratap Singh, who was one of his three legal heirs under Act of 1973 and vide its order dated 25/9/1975 held that 135.5 acres of land was in excess of ceiling limit and passed an order of his dispossession from surplus land. Kuldeep Singh filed an appeal before the Additional Collector Jaipur thereagainst, which was dismissed vide order dated 7/2/1966. Further appeal filed by respondent No.4 - Kuldeep Singh under the Act of 1973 before the Board of Revenue was also dismissed by the Board of Revenue vide judgment dated 10/1/1977. The judgment of Board of Revenue was challenged before this Court in D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.336/1977 and the Division Bench dismissed the writ petition vide judgment dated 10/1/1977. Kuldeep Singh then filed special leave to petition before Supreme Court being S.L.P.(C) Appeal No.8719/1988, which too was dismissed vide judgment dated 13/9/1988 with liberty to him to file review petition before Rajasthan High Court. However, all the issues were left open to be raised if necessity arise. Kuldeep Singh thereafter filed review petition before this Court, being D.B. Civil Review Petition No.16/1989. Division Bench of this Court vide order dated 10/11/1989 dismissed the review petition. It is in the backdrop of these facts that the petitioner claiming to be legal heir of Smt.Rasal Kunwar, has approached this Court by filing present writ petition praying for the aforesaid relief.
3. Stand of the petitioner is that Smt.Rasal Kunwar gifted her 1/3rd share of land measuring 90 bighas and 19 biswas of lands to him by a gift deed and mutation in his favour was attested by the revenue authorities on 23/11/1977. It is claimed that petitioner for the first time came to know that his land has been declared surplus in excess of ceiling limit in the year 1988 wh
Lachhman Dass vs. Jagat Ram and others ((2007) 10 SCC 448) 5
Hoshiarpur Centrlal Co-operative Bank Ltd.
Sabitri Dei & Ors. vs. Sarat Chandra Rout & Ors. ((1996) 3 SCC 301)
N. Bhargavan Pillai (dead) by L.Rs. & Anr. vs. State of Kerala (AIR 2004 SC 2317) 5
Nirmal Jeet Kaur vs. State of M.P. & Anr. ((2004) 7 SCC 558) 5
Ram Ratan vs. State of Rajasthan (1982 RLR 939) 9
State of Maharashtra vs. Keshav Wamanrao Joshi & Ors. (AIR 1990 SC 2058) 9
Mayuram Subramanian Srinivasan vs. CBI ((2006) 5 SCC 752) 9
Raghunath Laxman Wani & Ors. vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. (AIR 1971 SC 2137) 13
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.