SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Raj) 373

[Citation : 2011(4) RLW 3531 (Raj.)]
(Rajasthan High Court)
Jaipur Bench
Mool Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (Rafiq, J.)
HON'BLE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ, J.
Mool Singh
Versus
State of Rajasthan & Ors.
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3444 of 1989, decided on 25.04.2011

Advocates Appeared
K.K. Mehrishi Sr.Advocate with Sanjay Mehrishi, for Petitioner;
G.K. Garg, Sr.Advocate with Smt. Anita Agarwal, for Respondent No.4;
R.P. Singh, Additional Advocate General

Headnote:Rajasthan Imposition of Ceiling on Agriculture Holdings Act, 1973, Secs. 15, 40 — Reopening ceiling proceedings — Holding the land surplus/excess ordered to dispossess — Provided no opportunity of hearing nor notice u/S. 12 (2) and 13 was given — Competence of the S.D.O. — Held — Decree was obtained after notified date which cannot be taken into consideration for determination of surplus area of the land of a person — Petitioner him-self had no independent right to challenge the proceedings — Decree was obtained with the intention to defeat the provisions of the Act — Principles of nature justice depends upon the facts of given case — Proceedings were re-opened u/S. 15(2) by the order of the State Govt. which attained finality upto Supreme Court — It cannot possibly be reopened at the instance of petitioner in writ petition belatedly in 1989. (Paras 12 to 19)

       Writ petition dismissed.

       jktLFkku d`f"k tksrksa ij vf/kdre gncUnh vf/kfu;e] 1973] /kkjk 15] 40 & lhfyax dh dk;Zokgh iqu% vkjEHk djuk & Hkwfe dks vf/k'ks"k@vf/kd Bgjkrs gq, csn[ky djus ds vkns'k fn;s & u rks lquokbZ dk volj fn;k x;k vkSj u gh /kkjk 12¼2½ ,oa 13 ds rgr uksfVl fn;k x;k & mi[k.M vf/kdkjh dh l{kerk & vfHkfu/kkZfjr & vf/klwfpr frfFk ds ckn fMØh gkfly dh ftl ij fdlh O;fDr dh Hkwfe ds vf/k'ks"k {ks= ds vo/kkj.k gsrq fopkj ugha fd;k tk ldrk & bl dk;Zokgh dks pqukSrh nsus gsrq Lo;a izkFkhZ dks dksbZ Lora= vf/kdkj ugha Fkk & vf/kfu;e ds izko/kkuksa dks foQy djus ds vk'k; ls fMØh gkfly dh xbZ Fkh & uSlfxZd U;k; ds fl)kUrksa dh vuqikyuk lacaf/kr izdj.kksa ds rF;ksa ij fuHkZj djrh gS &jkT ljdkj ds vkns'k ls /kkjk 15¼2½ ds rgr dk;Zokgh iqu% vkjEHk dh xbZ Fkh tks fd loksZPp U;k;ky; rd vfUrerk vftZr dj pqdh Fkh & bls izkFkhZ dh izsj.kk ij ;kfpdk esa lEHkor;k 1989 esa foyfEcr voLFkk esa ugha [kksyk tk ldrk FkkA ¼in la[;k 12 ls 19½

       ;kfpdk [kkfjt dhA


       

Hon'ble RAFIQ, J.—This writ petition has been filed by petitioner-Mool Singh inter-alia with the prayer that a declaration be made that his agricultural holdings are not in excess of the ceiling area under the Rajasthan Imposition of Ceiling on Holding Act, 1973 (hereinafter be referred as the “Act of 1973”) and/or under Chapter-IIIB of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955 (for short, “Act of 1955”). It has been further prayed that respondents be restrained from dispossessing the petitioner from the land in question pursuant to orders passed by the respondents-authorities under the Act of 1973 supra and to declare such orders illegal and quash the same and respondents be further directed to hold a fresh proceedings after giving opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and decide the matter anew in accordance with law. Any other order prejudicial to the petitioner passed during the pendency of the writ petition be declared illegal and quashed.

2. Factual matrix of the case is that one Bhanu Pratap Singh, former-Jagirdar of Dudu of Jaipur District died on 21/5/1966. He was survived by his mother Smt.Rasal Kunwar, adopted son Kuldeep Singh and adopted daughter Jayendra Kumari, who are successors of Bhanu Pratap Singh according to Hindu Succession Act. Smt.Rasal Kunwar, widow of late Shri Jawan Singh and mother of Shri Bhanu Pratap Singh filed a suit for declaration before the Sub Divisional Officer Sambharlake. Said suit was decreed on 1/12/1971 and all the above referred to three legal heirs were held entitled to receive 1/3rd share each of the disputed land. The S.D.O. Sambharlake decided the ceiling case No.24/1971 on 6/12/1971 under Chapter-IIIB of the Act of 1955 and allowed all the above referred to three legal heirs entitled to retain 30 standard acres of land as independent unit and remaining land was declared surplus. It is claimed by petitioner that Smt.Rasal Kunwar executed a gift deed of her 1/3rd share (30 acres of land) in his favour on 9/4/1973. She also executed a Will in his favour on 18/12/1971 before coming into force the Act of 1973 w.e.f. 1/1/1973. The S.D.O. Sambharlake initiated fresh proceedings only against Kuldeep Singh, adopted son of Bhanu Pratap Singh, who was one of his three legal heirs under Act of 1973 and vide its order dated 25/9/1975 held that 135.5 acres of land was in excess of ceiling limit and passed an order of his dispossession from surplus land. Kuldeep Singh filed an appeal before the Additional Collector Jaipur thereagainst, which was dismissed vide order dated 7/2/1966. Further appeal filed by respondent No.4 - Kuldeep Singh under the Act of 1973 before the Board of Revenue was also dismissed by the Board of Revenue vide judgment dated 10/1/1977. The judgment of Board of Revenue was challenged before this Court in D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.336/1977 and the Division Bench dismissed the writ petition vide judgment dated 10/1/1977. Kuldeep Singh then filed special leave to petition before Supreme Court being S.L.P.(C) Appeal No.8719/1988, which too was dismissed vide judgment dated 13/9/1988 with liberty to him to file review petition before Rajasthan High Court. However, all the issues were left open to be raised if necessity arise. Kuldeep Singh thereafter filed review petition before this Court, being D.B. Civil Review Petition No.16/1989. Division Bench of this Court vide order dated 10/11/1989 dismissed the review petition. It is in the backdrop of these facts that the petitioner claiming to be legal heir of Smt.Rasal Kunwar, has approached this Court by filing present writ petition praying for the aforesaid relief.

3. Stand of the petitioner is that Smt.Rasal Kunwar gifted her 1/3rd share of land measuring 90 bighas and 19 biswas of lands to him by a gift deed and mutation in his favour was attested by the revenue authorities on 23/11/1977. It is claimed that petitioner for the first time came to know that his land has been declared surplus in excess of ceiling limit in the year 1988 wh
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top