SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Raj) 932

[Citation : 2012(2) RLW 986 (Raj.)]
(Rajasthan High Court)
Jaipur Bench
Pikki & Ors. Vs. State of Raj. (Kothari, J.)
HON'BLE RAGHUVENDRA S. RATHORE, J.
HON'BLE S.S. KOTHARI, J.
Pikki & Ors.
Versus
State of Rajasthan
D.B. Criminal Appeal No. 1489 of 2002, decided on 14.09.2011

Advocates Appeared
Dilip Sinsinwar, for Appellants;
Javed Choudhary, P.P., for State;
Vipul Jaiman for S.S. Sunda, for Complainant

Headnote:(a) Penal Code, Secs. 302, 148, 324, 323, 149 — Credibility of testimony of interested and related witnesses who sustained injuries in the occurrence — Held — The testimony of an injured witness is accorded a special status in law — A witness is normally to be considered independent unless he or she springs from sources which are likely to be tainted — Ordinarily a close relation would be the last to screen the real culprit and falsely implicate an innocent person. (Paras 7 to 9)

       ¼d½ n.M lafgrk] /kkjk 302] 148] 324] 323] 149 & ,sls fgrc) ,oa lEcU/kh lk{khx.k ds lk{; dh fo'oluh;rk ftUgsa ?kVuk esa pksVs igqaph & vfHkfu/kkZfjr & pksfVy lk{kh ds lk{; dks fof/k esa fof'k"B gSfl;r iznku xbZ gS & ,sls lk{kh dks lkekU;r;k fu"i{k ekuuk gksrk gS tc rd fd og fdlh ,sls L=ksrksa ls ugha fudyrk gks ftuds dyafdr gksus dh lEHkkouk gks & lkekU;r;k ,d utnhdh fj'rsnkj okLrfod vijk/kh dks fNikus rFkk fdlh funksZ"k O;fDr dks >wBk Qalkus dk dke ugha djsxkA ¼in la[;k 7 ls 9½

       (b) Penal Code, Secs. 302, 148, 324, 323, 149 — Necessity to prove motive — Held — When the occurrence was spoken to by eye witnesses and the same was supported by medical report, it will not be necessary to investigate the motive behind such commission of offence. (Para 17)

       Appeal dismissed.

       ¼[k½ n.M lafgrk] /kkjk 302] 148] 324] 323] 149 & gsrq lkfcr djus dh vko';drk & vfHkfu/kkZfjr & tc ?kVuk ds ckjs esa p'en~nhn lk{khx.k }kjk cryk;k x;k rFkk og fpfdRlh; fjiksVZ ls lefFkZr Fkk rks ,sls vijk/k ds dkfjr djus ds ihNs gsrq dk vUos"k.k djus dh vko';drk ugha gksxhA

       vihy [kkfjt dhA ¼in la[;k 17½


       

Hon'ble KOTHARI, J.—This appeal challenges the conviction and sentence awarded to the appellants by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track), Alwar in Sessions Case No.40/2002 (45/02), State vs. Pikki & Ors. on 17.10.2002, which are as under:-

Appellants Pikki and Munshi Singh

1. Section 302 IPC: Life imprisonment and fine of Rs.5000/- each. In default one year rigorous imprisonment.

2. Section 148: Three years rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs.1000/- each. In default six months rigorous imprisonment.

3. Section 324 IPC: Three years rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs.1000/- each. In default, six months rigorous imprisonment.

4. Section 323/149: Six months rigorous imprisonment.

Appellants Sohan Singh and Mst. Rajo Kaur.

1. Section 302/149 IPC: Life imprisonment and fine of Rs.2000/- each. In default one year rigorous imprisonment.

2. Section 148: Three years rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs.1000/-each. In default, six months rigorous imprisonment.

3. Section 324/149 IPC: Three years rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs.1000/- each. In default, six months rigorous imprisonment.

4. Section 323/149 IPC: Six months rigorous imprisonment.

2. The brief facts of the case are that Dr. Amar Singh Rathore PW-14 sent a letter (Ext.P32) to the Police informing that Bhagwan Singh, S/o Satnam Singh, resident of Mugaska, is admitted on bed no.4 in the hospital due to stab wound and necessary action may be taken. In turn Rajendra Prasad, Sub-Inspector, N.E.B. Police Chowki, Police Station Shivaji Park, Alwar, on receiving a wireless message that the persons injured in a scuffle at Village Mugaska have been admitted in the General Hospital, Alwar, reached the hospital where Kashmir Singh, S/o Satram Singh, submitted a written report (Ext.P7) stating therein that at about 6.00 P.M. on 06.12.2001, an altercation took place between his brother Dalip Singh and Sohan Singh with regard to the amount of credit of his shop. On account of it, Munshi Singh, Pikki Singh, Tinku Singh, Sohan Singh and his wife Mst. Rajo caught hold of his brother and gave him a beating. When Bhagwan alias Jeewa and he went to rescue Dalip Singh, the aforesaid persons assaulted them also. Munshi Singh, Pikki Singh, Tinku Singh and Sohan Singh attacked his brother Dalip Singh and Bhagwan Singh with knives and they were seriously injured. Both of them were taken to the hospital and on reaching there his brother Dalip Singh was declared dead. The condition of Bhagwan Singh was also serious. Munshi inflicted an injury on his back with a knife. After the beating, the aforesaid persons have given threats for further beating and action may be taken against them. The aforesaid written report was sent to the Police Station, on which an FIR (No.290/2001) was registered for offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 302 and 307 IPC.

The Police conducted the investigation and the accused persons were arrested. Accused Pikki, Munshi Singh and Vikram Singh gave information (Exts.P41 to P43) under Section 27 of Indian Evidence Act and at their behest knives were recovered vide recovery memos Exts.P5, P23 and P25. The Police recovered clothes of deceased persons vide Exts.P21 and P22 and sent them for analysis to FSL. Knives recovered from the accused persons were also sent for analysis to F.S.L. The Police investigated the site and got the post-mortem conducted of Dalip Singh and Bhagwan Singh (who expired on the night of 6.12.2001). After completion of investigation, Police submitted a report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. against accused Munshi Singh, Pikky, Vikram Singh alias Tinku for offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 307, 302 IPC and Section 4/25 of Arms Act and against Sohan Singh, Mst. Rajo Kaur for offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 307 and 302 IPC in the Court of Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate No.2, Alwar. It was also mentioned in the report that accused Sohan Singh alias Kala is absconding. The learned Judicial Magistrate took cognizance aga





































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top