SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Raj) 326

(Rajasthan High Court)
Jaipur Bench
Ammini P.T. (Smt.) Vs. Union of India & Ors. (Jain-I, J.)
HON'BLE ARUN MISHRA, CJ.
HON'BLE NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN-I, J.
Ammini P.T. (Smt.)
Versus
Union of India & Ors.
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3588 of 2010, decided on 13.03.2012

Advocates Appeared
Ms. Gayatri Rathore, for Petitioner;
M.S. Raghav, for Respondents

Headnote:Service Matters — Regularisation of services giving relaxation in qualification — Working as staff nurse for last 27 years — Without any complaint against her work — Initially appointed on daily wages due to emergency against regular post — Held — Practical experience would always aid the person to effectively discharge the duties is a sure guide to assess the suitability — The initial minimum educational qualification prescribed for the post is a factor to be reckoned with at the time of initial entry into service — Once the appointments were made as daily rated workers and they were allowed to work for a considerable length of time, it would be hard and harsh to deny them confirmation on the respective post on the ground that they lack the prescribed educational qualification — Her qualification have not come in the way of discharge of her duties — Directed to regularise her services treating her to be qualified on the basis of her continuous satisfactory work of 27 years. (Paras 22 to 25)

       Writ petition allowed.

        lsok ekeys & ;ksX;rk esa NwV nsrs gq, lsok dk fu;eu djuk & vius dk;Z ds ckjs esa fcuk fdlh f'kdk;r ds fiNys 27 o"kksZ ls LVkQ ulZ ds :i esa dk;Z dj jgh gS & fu;fer in ij vkikrdky ds dkj.k vkjEHk esa nSfud etnwjh ij fu;qfDr nh & vfHkfu/kkZfjr & drZO;ksa ds izHkkoh fu"iknu gsrq O;kogkfjd vuqHko lnSo gh mldh enn djsxk rFkk mldh mi;qDrrk dk fu/kkZj.k djus gsrq fuf'pr :i ls ekxZn'kZd gS & vkjfEHkd U;wure 'kS{kf.kd ;ksX;rk tks ml in gsrq fu/kkZfjr gksrh gS og lsok esa izos'k ds le; gh x.kuk djus gsrq dkjd gksrk gS & ,d ckj nSfud nj ij deZdkj ds :i esa fu;qfDr nsdj mUgsa nh?kZdky rd dk;Z djrs jgus dh vuqefr nh xbZ Fkh rks vc bl vk/kkj ij mUgsa Øe'k% inksa ij lEiq"V fd;s tkus ls badkj djuk cM+k dBksj gksxk fd muesa fu/kkZfjr 'kS{kf.kd ;ksX;rk dk vHkko gS & mldh ;ksX;rk mlds drZO;ksa dk fuoZgu djus esa dHkh vkM+s ugha vkbZ & 27 o"kksZ dh mldh fujUrj larks"ktud lsok ds vk/kkj ij mls vfgZr ekurs gq, mldh lsok dk fu;eu djus ds funsZ'k fn;sA ¼in la[;k 22 ls 25½

       ;kfpdk Lohdkj dhA


       

Hon'ble JAIN-I, J.—Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. Petitioner has preferred this writ petition challenging the order dated 12.10.2006 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Jaipur Bench, Jaipur, whereby Original Application No.20/2006, filed by petitioner for issuing direction to respondents to regularise the services of applicant on the post of Staff Nurse or any other suitable post with all consequential benefits and further to direct the respondents to relax condition which deprived the applicant in regularisation, has been disposed off.

3. Briefly stated the facts of the writ petition are that the petitioner filed an Original Application before the Central Administrative Tribunal with the averments that she possessed the qualification of Ist pre-degree from the University of Kerala and final from the International Nursing Institute, Thiruvalla, Kerala State. She was appointed as Staff Nurse on daily wage due to emergency against regular post on 17.09.1985 in P & T Dispensary No.2 with the condition that pay and allowance on minimum scale will be allowed till regularisation. It was averred that petitioner continued on the post with the hope that her services will be regularised against vacant post. Since petitioner was being paid only minimum scale plus D.A. without other allowance, therefore, she preferred Original Application No.161/1990 before the Central Administrative Tribunal, which was allowed vide order dated 08.12.1994 with a direction to respondents to consider the case of applicant for appointment as a Staff Nurse on regular basis in accordance with the P & T Department Nurses(non-resident) Recruitment Rules, 1978 (for short 'the Recruitment Rules, 1978'). The petitioner was allowed minimum scale of the regular pay scale. She made a request for regularisation of her services from time to time, but her services were not regularised, therefore, she again filed Original Application No.20/2006, which was disposed off by the Tribunal vide order dated 12.10.2006, which is under challenge in this writ petition.

4. The respondents, in their reply to writ petition, admitted that petitioner is working as Staff Nurse in P & T Dispensary No.2, Jaipur w.e.f. 17.09.1985. She passed Ist pre-degree examination in April, 1981 from the University of Kerala and final examination from the International Nursing Institute, Thiruvalla, Kerala State and she completed the course of nursing and midwifery. She was appointed as Staff Nurse on daily wages and she is drawing the minimum of the pay scale 4000-6000 plus usual D.A. The case of petitioner for appointment on the post of Staff Nurse was examined as per the directions of Tribunal, given vide order dated 08.12.1994, and it was found that petitioner does not fulfill the conditions, required for the post for regular appointment, as laid down in the Recruitment Rules, 1978. It was further averred that in order to provide relief up to certain extent, the Chief Post Master General, Rajasthan Circle, Jaipur has referred the case of petitioner to the Director General, Department of Posts, New Delhi for approval of the Directorate to grant temporary status treating her as full-time casual labourer in P & T Dispensary No.2, Jaipur, vide letter dated 28.04.2004. However, the Director General (Posts), New Delhi, vide its letter dated 19.04.2006, informed that the case of petitioner has been considered in consultation with the Department of Personal and Training and DOP & T have not agreed to the proposal as the petitioner does not possess the mandatory educational qualification/ experience.

5. The learned Tribunal vide its order dated 12.10.2006, held that the applicant is not entitled to a relief regarding regularisation of her services on the post of Staff Nurse, but observed that the applicant was allowed to continue as Staff Nurse even after the judgment rendered by the Tribunal in Original Application, decided on 08.12.1994. This fact proves that work is available with the De




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top