SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Raj) 690

GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS
Surya Prakash – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
P.S. Bhati/Kailash Khatri, for Petitioners;
G.R. Punia, A.A.G. with Mahendra Choudhary, Dy. Govt. Counsel;
Kuldeep Mathur, for NCTE;
Rakesh Arora, for Board of Secondary Education;
A.K. Rajvanshi, H.S. Sidhu, Ashok Chhangani, R.S. Choudhary, T.S. Tanwar, Kailash Jangid, Rajesh Jangid, Rakesh Matoriya, V.N. Calla, Bharat Dewasi, J.S. Bhaleria, A.R. Godara, Kan Singh Oad, S.S. Jodha, Vinod Choudhary, D.L. Rawla, Jog Singh, Amit Gaur, Rajesh Panwar, C.R. Choudhary, Ramdev Potaliya, M.S. Godara, O.P. Bishnoi, Shyam Khatri, Vijay Purohit, Vikram Singh, Anuj Sahlot, Nishant Motsara, Manish Dadhich, N.S. Rajpurohit, D.L. Mothsara, B.S. Deora, V.K. Bhadu, B.L. Dudy, Vinit Sanadhya, R.C. Joshi, L.K. Ramdhari, Mahaveer Bishnoi, Girish Sankhla, J.D.S. Bhati, Sheetal Kumbhat, V.R. Choudhary, Shardul Bishnoi, Msw Pintu Pareek, B.K. Vyas, S.R. Choudhary, S.K. Punia, Awardan Charan, Ankur Mathur, Gopal Bose, S.K. Verma, Devesh Bohra, Ashwani Swami, B.L. Bishnoi, Manoj Purohit, Trilok Joshi, Sushil Kumar, Ms Aruna Negi, Gopal Acharya, Ms Anjana Jawa, Narpat Singh, P.R. Mehta, Deepesh Beniwal, Rahul Sharma, P.S. Rathore, Dwarkesh Vyas, Om Rajpurohit, Moti Singh, R.D.S.S. Kharlia, N.R. Budhania, J.P. Swami, P.S. Chundawat, Arjun Purohit, Deepak Nehra, S.K. Verma, H.S. Choudhary, B.S. Tanwar, T.C. Sharma, Vikas Binjariya, S.N. Goswami, M.L. Khatri, N.A. Rajpurohit, Bharat Shrimali, Mahendra Prajapat, R.R. Bishnoi, H.S. Inda, K.L. Chauhan, Harish Purohit, K.L. Bishnoi, Kunal Paliwal, T.R. Choudhary, S.R. Godara, Vishal Jangid, Vishal Jangid, J.R. Bhardwaj, Ms Premlata Gaur, Rohitesh Singh, Mahaveer Singh, D.L.R. Vyas, M.P. Pareek, H.S. Bishnoi, S.S. Rathore, Balvinder Singh, V.K. Sharma, K.R. Bhati, Dishant Gaur, Parikshit Nayak, Laxman Bishnoi, Dr. Vinay Chhipa, Surendra Bachmaliani, Ajay Vyas, R. Bhatnagar, Sushil Bishnoi, S.S. Rathore and Sukesh Bhati, J.R. Anjana, R.L. Baloch, Govind Suthar, Advocates for petitioners in the Writ Petitions

Hon'ble VYAS, J.—In the above writ petitions and the writ petitions mentioned in the Schedule appended to this judgment, common dispute and question of law is involved with regard to seeking direction to the respondent State for considering the candidature of those candidates who possess academic degree of graduation with B.Ed and have cleared Phase-I of the Rajasthan TET for the level Classes I to V for appointment on the posts of Teacher Grade-III of Level - I. Accordingly, all these writ petitions shall stand disposed of by this common order/judgment.

2. The Central Government enacted the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 (Act No.35 of 2009), in which, under Section 23(1) it is provided that minimum qualification shall be laid down by an academic authority authorized by the Central Government. The Central Government authorised the National Council for Teacher Education (“the NCTE” hereinafter) to lay down the minimum qualification for appointment of Teachers. The NCTE, after authorization, laid down the qualifications for Teacher vide notification dated 23.08.2010 (which is subsequently amended vide notification dated 29.07.2011). In para 3 of the above














































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top