SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Raj) 18

ALOK SHARMA
Firm Roop Prakash Enterprizes – Appellant
Versus
Vidhya – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
Saransh Saini, for Petitioners;
U.P. Gaur, for Respondents

Hon'ble SHARMA, J.—In this petition both under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India the petitioner has challenged the judgment dated 17th May, 2010 delivered by the Appellate Rent Tribunal, Jaipur partially upholding the order dated 14.2.2008 passed by the Rent Tribunal, Jaipur in Original Application No. 790/2004. The consequence of the judgment dated 17th May, 2010 is that the Original Application of the respondent landlord (hereinafter to be referred to as "the landlord") stands allowed and a certificate of possession issued against the petitioners tenants (hereinafter to be referred to as "the tenant").

2. Facts of the case are that the landlord filed a Original Application under Section 9 of the Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001 (hereinafter to be referred to as "the Act of 2001") against the tenant, inter-alia, on the grounds of reasonable and bona-fide need, non-user, default in payment of monthly rent and arrears of rent. The Rent Tribunal allowed the Original Application and issued a certificate of possession in favour of the landlord on all the four counts. In the appeal laid by the tenant before the Appellate Rent Tribunal it was pointed out that the Rent Trib















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top