SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Raj) 1017

ALOK SHARMA
Ashok Kumar Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
Rakesh Kumar, for Petitioners;
R.K. Mathur, Senior Advocate with Aditya Mathur, for Respondents

Hon'ble SHARMA, J.—Since all these writ petitions involve identical issues they are being decided by a common order. The facts of the writ peti-tion No.12519/2012 are being taken as a lead case for disposal of these cases.

2. The Urban Improvement Trust, Alwar (hereinafter `the UIT') in March, 2008 carved out a special commercial scheme titled Sculptures Welfare Scheme. The purpose of the scheme was to allot a plot each to eligible sculptors to facilitate them in their trade/ business. Pursuant to publication of the Sculptures commercial Scheme, the petitioners herein and others applied for allotment of plots to the UIT by depositing Rs.10,000/- each as security amount. A Committee was constituted by the UIT for conducting a lottery on 1-3-2008 for allotment of plots. A list of eligible successful applicants was thereafter prepared and instructions to deposit 50% of the amount payable were issued. The name of the petitioner was shown at Sr. No.3 in the list successful allottees and plot No.46 measuring 167.22 sq. meters. allotted to him. For this purpose the Secretary, UIT issued a letter dated 5-3-2008 recording the aforesaid fact and requiring him to pay 50% amount of the total co






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top