SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Raj) 1014

Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur Bench
Honble ARUN MADAN & K.S. RATHORE, JJ.
Rochees Hotels Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. - Appellant
Versus
Jaipur Development Authority - Respondents
D.B. Civil Special Appeal No. 787 of 1998
Decided On : September 15, 2001

Advocates Appeared:
R.D. Rastogi, for Appellants Bharat Vyas, for JDA. Bharat Vyas, for Appellant JDA R.D. Rastogi, for Respondents

Headnote:Contractual Obligation – Representation for approval of building plans for construction of hotel – As per contractual terms deposited the required amount – Approval was not given for four years – Writ petition disposed of with the direction to either accord permission or to refund the amount with 18% – Held – Direction of the Single Judge is wholly innocuous and irrational – No dispute with regard to title and possession of land – Once an agreement arrived between the parties, the instrumentalities of the State under statutory obligation have to perform it – It has no authority to alter or change the same to the detriment of the aggrieved party in an arbitrary or irrational manner. (Paras 21 to 24 & 35)

       The JDA was thus under a contractual obligation not only to approve the building plans but also to give necessary approval and by its refusal had violated the statutory obligation to great prejudice and disadvantage of the appellants. (Para 22)

       The only authority that could question the validity of the contract is the judicial forum and thus it was not open to the JDA to have refused to discharge its statutory obligation on the ground that the circumstances under which the contract was arrived at, was a matter of investigation before the State Govt. or its functionaries. This argument advanced by the learned for the JDA during the course of hearing is wholly irrational and not sustainable and consequently the impugned order of the learned Single Judge cannot be sustained. (Para 23)

       Once an agreement having been concluded between the parties, the instrumentalities of the State or the Board or the Corporation under statutory obligation have to perform the agreement once entered into and lawfully executed and concluded. It has no authority to alter or change the same to the detriment of the aggrieved party in an arbitrary or irrational manner. (Para 35)

Honble MADAN, J.–Since both these appeals arise out of the common impugned order dated 14.8.1998 passed by the learned Single Judge disposing of writ petition bearing SB Civil Writ Petition No.5766/1997 (Rochess Hotels Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. vs. Jaipur Development Authority), they are being decided by this common order.

(2). The appellant Rochees Hotels Pvt. Ltd. is a Public Limited Company incorporated and registered under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 while appellant Ishwar Dass is the Director of the said appellant Company. The appellants entered into an agreement dt. 10.5.1987 for purchase of 2450 Sq.Yds. of land situated at Tonk Road, Jaipur which was executed between Shri Parmanand Ojha in his personal capacity as well as in the capacity of Power of Attorney Holder on behalf of Smt. Padmawati Ojha. On the basis of above agreement dt. 10.5.1987, the registered sale deeds were executed in favour of Ishwar Dass, Laxman Dass and Nanak Dass sons of late Shri Rochi Ram for sale of the aforesaid land which were duly registered by the Sub- Registrar, Jaipur on 18.12.1989.

(3). Before dealing with the contentions advanced by the learned counsel for the parties, we would like to refer to the brief background which is relevant for deciding the controversy between the parties thus:-

(4). A patta was executed by the Government of the former State of Jaipur on 10.10.1909 in respect of 70 bighas of land, including the land in dispute, whereby lease for a period upto Samwat 1994 (1937-38 AD) was granted to one Shri Praduman Ojha. Before the expiry of period of the lease, with the said patta, the Government of the former State of Jaipur, issued Tenancy Rules for `Chak Bandi Village on 23.12.1931 which were brought into force w.e.f. September, 1931 and under Rule 2 of the said Rules a right was conferred on every tenant to occupy his holding for his life time, and Rule 4 provided that on the death of a tenant, his legal heirs shall be entitled to retain possession of the holding for a period of five years from the first date of September next following the date of the tenants death, on payment of the rent payable by the deceased tenant and on the expiry of four years, the Tehsildar was required to report for the orders of the Nazim whether in his opinion the legal heirs should or should not be permitted to retain the holding for his life. By virtue of these Rules Shri Praduman Ojha was entitled to continue as tenant through his life time. During his lifetime itself, the Govt. of former State of Jaipur issued a notification dt. 17.9.1945, whereby the tenant who had completed 10 years of his possession in Samwat 2000 (1943 AD), was deemed to be a tenant of old standing and was not liable to be ejected. Thereafter, by virtue of the provisions of Sec. 8 of the Jaipur Tenancy Act, 1945, Shri Praduman Ojha became the khatedar tenant of the said land as on the date of commencement of the said Act, he was in continuous occupation of the land in dispute as a tenant. By virtue of Sec. 8(1) of Jaipur State Grants Land Tenure Act, 1947 and the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1945 as well, Shri Praduman Ojha acquired the Khatedari rights in his favour as regards the same land and after his death, on 14.5.1965, his legal heirs succeeded to his right in the land and remain in possession of the said land. Meanwhile, in Samwat 1987 (1931 AD) `Misal Haquiyat (settlement) of Village Bhojpura was prepared by the Govt. of the former State of Jaipur and the name of Pandit Madhu Sudhanji, father of late Shri Praduman Ojha was entered therein as cultivator of the land in dispute. On 15.11.1951 the Revenue Department issued certain directions to the effect that Smt. Padmawati Ojha wife of late Shri Praduman Ojha may continue to enjoy the income derived out of garden and 15 bighas of land, as she had earlier been deriving till then. The total area referred to above forms part of Khasra No. 477 to 484 and a part of Khasra No. 485 of village Bhojpura measuring 76 bighas.


















































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top