SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Raj) 586

PRASHANT KUMAR AGARWAL
Kuldip Kumar Lal – Appellant
Versus
Suman Rani – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:C.L. Saini, Advocate.

Judgment :

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. The petitioner-husband has preferred this Civil Revision Petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the impugned order dated 21.1.2011 passed by District Judge, Alwar in Civil Misc.Case No.41/13/10 whereby the learned Court below by allowing an application under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC filed by the non-petitioner-wife has set aside the exparte decree dated 27.8.2009 passed in Matrimonail Case No.29/2008.

3. Brief relevant facts for the disposal of this petition are that the petitioner filed a petition under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act (hereinafter to be referred as “the Act”) against his wife-non-petitioner with a prayer to dissolve the marriage between the parties said to be solemnised on 13.12.2006 on various grounds. That petition was registered as Matrimonial Case No.29/2008 and in compliance of the notice issued, non-petitioner appeared before the Court below through her counsel and also filed reply to the petition. Subsequently, she and her counsel failed to appear and, therefore, on 29.5.2009 an order was passed to proceed exparte against the non-petitioner and thereafter evidence of the pe




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top