SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Raj) 543

MOHAMMAD RAFIQ
Ramsaroop – Appellant
Versus
Gramvasiyan Panchayat Circle Aayana Panchayat Samiti – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
Kamla Jain with Mahendra Singh, for Petitioners;
Jinesh Jain, Govt. Counsel, for Respondents

Hon'ble RAFIQ, J.—All these writ petitions are directed against identical orders passed by Additional District Collector, Kota, Dated 27.3.2006 by which revision petitions filed by certain residents of village Aayana, Panchayat Samiti Itawa, Tehsil Pipalda, District Kota, have been allowed and pattas issued in favour of petitioners for allotment of pieces of land to all of them except two, in the varying size of 5-1/2' x 8'5 x 9', 10' x 11', or 10' x 15', 20' x 12' 9' x 12' for running kiosks to earn their livelihood, have been cancelled. Two of petitioners, namely Swami Vivekanand School, Aayana (CW : 10309/2009) and Bajrang Vayyam Shala (CW-4759/2009), were allotted a larger chunk of land measuring 6320 square, yard for setting-up school and 554 square yard for setting up a public gym, respectively, which too have been cancelled by the impugned orders.

2. Factual matrix of the case is that Gram Panchayat, Aayana issued patta of land in favour of petitioner on or about 20.12.2004. Originally, part of this land was allotted to Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (for short, `BSNL') but BSNL informed the Gram Panchayat that it did not require the land and therefore allotment may be cancelle




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top