SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Raj) 782

MOOLCHAND MEENA
Ishwar Singh – Appellant
Versus
Ram Singh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
Ashok Agrawal, for Petitioners;
Vikas Parashar, for Respondents

MEENA, M.—This review petition under Section 229 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as `the Act of 1955') has been filed by the applicant aggrieved by order dated 5th December, 2011 passed by the Division Bench of this Board in appeal No. 11563/2007. One member of the Division Bench has since retired; therefore, the present review petition has been heard and is being decided by this Court as single member.

2. Brief facts of the case leading to this review petition are that petitioners/plaintiffs filed a suit for declaration and permanent injunction in the Court of Sub-Divisional Officer, Bhawanimandi regarding disputed land consisting of khasra number 1022 and 590 measuring to 5 Bighas and 11 Biswas. The basis of the suit was that the land in question was purchased by Moti Lal in the name of his minor sons-Man Singh and Ram Singh, and for this reason, it was ancestral land of the plaintiffs. But, Man Singh sold his 1/2 share of the disputed land without any authority vide registered sale deed dated 29th June 2006. The Trial Court after hearing both the parties, treating the sale deed dated 10th December, 2002 as void, decreed the suit. Present non petitione
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top