SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Raj) 63

GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS
Om Prakash Khadaria – Appellant
Versus
Navratan Mal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
Jagdish Vyas, for Petitioner;
S.L. Jain, for Respondents

Hon'ble VYAS, J.—In this writ petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, petitioner plaintiff is challenging the validity of impugned order dated 21.7.2012 (Annex. 6) passed by Civil Judge (J.D.) Nohar in Civil Original Suit No. 75/2011 and prayed that while quashing the above order, the application filed by the respondent No. 1 under Section 10 of CPC may kindly be dismissed and trial Court may be directed to proceed with the suit expeditiously.

2. As per facts of the case, a suit for eviction was filed in the year 1996 by the petitioner plaintiff on the ground of material alteration in the court of Civil Judge (J.D.), Nohar under the provisions of Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1950 [hereinafter referred to as `the Act of 1950'] and the suit was dismissed by Civil Judge (J.D.) Nohar. Against that judgment and decree, an appeal was preferred by the petitioner. The Additional District Judge Nohar allowed the appeal filed by the petitioner plaintiff and decree for eviction was passed in favour of the petitioner on the ground of material alteration.

3. The respondent defendant preferred second appeal before this Court against the judgment dat


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top