PRASHANT KUMAR AGARWAL
Shyam Sunder – Appellant
Versus
Prakash Chand – Respondent
2. Brief relevant facts for the disposal of this appeal may be stated as below:-
(i) Originally the suit for eviction from the suit shop was filed by Shri Nathmal, elder brother of plaintiff-respondent-Shri Prakash Chandra, on 2.7.1998 in the trial Court with the averment that the tenancy commenced with effect from 1.6.1995 and the appellant is liable to be evicted on the grounds of default in payment of rent, subletting, damage caused to the suit shop and nuisance.
(ii) Written statement was filed by the appellant on 1.9.1999 and grounds taken in the plaint were specifically denied.
Ishar & Ors. vs. Sudesh Kumar & Anr. (AIR 1973 P&H 392) 3
P. Dasa Muni Reddy vs. Appa Rao (AIR 1974 SC 2089) 3
Lachoo Mal vs. Radhey Shyam (AIR 1971 SC 2213) 3
Bhoop Singh vs. Ram Singh Major & Ors. (AIR 1996 SC 196) 3
Pankaja & Anr. vs. Yellappa (Dead) by Lrs. & Ors. ((2004) 6 SCC 415) 4
B. Banerjee vs. Smt.Anita Pan (AIR 1975 SC 1146) 4
South Konkan Distrilleries & Anr. vs. Prabhakar Gajanan Naik & Ors. ((2008) 14 SCC 632) 4
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.