ALOK SHARMA
Ummed Kanwar – Appellant
Versus
Prabhu Singh – Respondent
2. The facts of the case are that an election petition under Section 43 of the Act of 1994 read with Rule 80 of the Rajasthan Panchayati Raj (Election) Rules, 1994 (hereinafter 'the Rules of 1994') was filed by the election petitioner, Prabhu Singh, alleging that the petitioner herein and respondent before the trial court (he
Management of Madurantakam Coop. Sugar Mills Ltd. vs. S. Vishwanathan ((2005) 3 SCC 193) 8
Apparel Export Promotion Council vs. A.K. Chopra ((1999) 1 SCC 759) 8
Jayanta Samal vs. Kulamani Behera ((2004) 13 SCC 552) 8
Kundan Lal Rallaram vs. Custodian, Evacuee Property
Vatal Nagaraj vs. R. Dayanand Sagar ((1975) 4 SCC 127) 20
State of Punjab vs. Mohinder Singh ((2005) 3 SCC 702) 22
Umesh Chandar vs. State of Rajasthan ((1982) 2 SCC 202) 22
Cheedi Ram vs. Jhilmit Ram & Ors. ((1984) 2 SCC 281) 23
Vishwanatna Reddy vs. Konappa Rudrappa Nadgouda & Anr. (AIR 1969 SC 604) 24
Prakash Khandre vs. Dr. Vijay Kumar Khandre & Ors. ((2002) 5 SCC 568) 24
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.