AJAY RASTOGI, J.K.RANKA
Rajesh Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
2. A cardinal question which emerges for consideration is as to whether a candidate, upon having availed of relaxation in age, acquiring eligibility to participate in the process of selection, besides special relaxation/concessions under the Scheme of Service Rules which participating in competitive examination (written test/viva voce)/process of selection; if secured more marks than of last candidate and finally got placement in select list against vacancies of open/general category, can be considered for being selected against vacancy of unreserved/open category or deserves to be migrated n select list of open/general category vacancy and what will be the effect in the instant bunch of cases regarding Circular dt. 11.5.2011 issued by State Government after the process of selection being initiated with reference to advertisement dt. 14.10.2010 for the post of Constable and advertisement dt. 25.11.2010 for the post of Sub Inspector of Police.
• 3. Facts in r
Jitendra Kumar Singh vs. State of U.P. ((2010) 3 SCC 119) 8
K. Manjusree vs. State of Andh. Pradesh ((2008) 3 SCC 512) 14
Tej Prakash Pathak vs. Rajasthan High Court ((2013) 4 SCC 540) 14
State of Haryana vs. Subhash Chander Marwaha ((1974) 3 SCC 220) 56
P. Mahendran vs. State of Karn. ((1990) 1 SCC 411) 56
Yogesh Yadav vs. Union of India (2013(10) SCALE 333) 56
Parmender Kumar vs. State of Haryana ((2012) 1 SCC 177) 56
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.