MOHAMMAD RAFIQ
Tek Chand – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
This matter has come up for orders on the application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Order 1 Rule 10 of the Code of Civil procedure, filed by applicants Bhag Chand S/o Son @ Sonya and Nathu Lal S/o Son @ Sonya, seeking their impleadment as party respondents to the instant writ petition.
Challenge in the writ petition is made to the notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act dated 15.03.1999 and the notification under Section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act dated 16.03.2000 which seek to acquire the land of Khasra No. 556, 557, 558, 561 and 562 of village Sukhiya, Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur. Writ petition was filed by Tek Chand, way back in 2000, who claimed to have purchased this land by two registered sale-deeds dated 22.02.1996; by one of sale-deeds, the petitioner purchased land bearing Khasra Nos. 561 and 562 from Shri Ladu Ram S/o Gangaram Bagda Brahman, resident of village Sukhiya and through another sale-deed, he purchased the land bearing Khasra Nos. 556, 557 and 558, total measuring 1.18 hectares, from Shri Laduram and one Shri Nanagram S/o Sujya and Smt. Gyarsi Widow of Sujya.
Shri Suresh Pareek, learned Senior Counsel for
Savitri Devi vs. District Judge
Union of India vs. Sher Singh & Ors. ((1993) 1 SCC 608) 8
Savitri Devi vs. District Judge
Ramesh Hirachand Kundanmal vs. Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay & Ors. ((1992) 2 SCC 524) 16
Anil Kumar Singh vs. Shivnath Mishra @ Gadasa Guru ((1995) 3 SCC 147) 18
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.