PRASHANT KUMAR AGARWAL
Om Prakash Mund – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
2. The accused-petitioners have moved this application for grant of bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in respect of Complaint Case No.81/2009 pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate No.1, (Jaipur Development Authority), Jaipur for the offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 read with Section 120-B IPC and Sections 31 and 72 of the Jaipur Development Authority Act. The application filed by the petitioners for grant of bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. has been dismissed by the Additional Sessions Judge No.3, Jaipur Metropolitan vide order dated 27.07.2013.
3. Brief relevant facts for the disposal of this application may be stated as under:-
(i) Complainant-Shri Hamendra Kumar Mehta filed criminal complaint against the petitioners and co-accused for the offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 474 read with Section 120-B IPC and Sections 31 and 72 of the Jaipur Development Authority Act before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate No.1, (Jaipur Development Authority) and cognizance was taken for the aforesaid offences vide order dated 13.10.2010. In support of the complaint, statement of the complainant was re
Official Liquidator vs. Dayanand & Ors. ((2008) 10 SCC 1) Para 5
Special Deputy Collector (L.A.) vs. N. Vasudeva Rao & Ors. (AIR 2008 SC 944) Para 5
Md. Ibrahim & Ors. vs. State of Bihar & Anr. ((2009) 8 SCC 751) Para 5
Inder Mohan Goswami & Anr. vs. State of Uttaranchal (AIR 2008 SC 251) Para 5
State of Haryana & Ors. vs. Dinesh Kumar (AIR 2008 SC 1083) Para 7
Niranjan Singh & Anr. vs. Prabhakar Rajaram Kharote & Ors. (AIR 1980 SC 785) Para 7
Nirmal Jeet Kaur vs. State of M.P. & Anr. ((2004) 7 SCC 558) Para 7
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.