HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN
Jaipur Bench
Virendra @Mahaveer & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan (Rafiq, J.)
HON'BLE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ, J.
HON'BLE J.K. RANKA, J.
Virendra @Mahaveer & Ors.
Versus
State of Rajasthan
D.B. Criminal Appeal Nos.709, 634 & 800 of 2008 and 448 of 2011,
decided on 30.08.2013
Appeal allowed. (Paras 20 to 26)
n.M lafgrk] /kkjk 395] 332] 353] 365] 149] 147] 148( vk;q) vf/kfu;e] 1959] /kkjk 3@25] 4@25 & 'kuk[r ijsM & vfHk;qDrksa dks 'kuk[r ijsM ds iwoZ fn[kk;k x;k & vf/kdka'kr% vfHk;qDr fiNys lkr o"kksZ ls lyk[kksa ds ihNs gS & vfHkfu/kkZfjr & 'kuk[r ijsM nwf"kr gqbZ & bl izdkj ds lk{; ds vk/kkj ij nks"kflf) dk vuqeksnu djuk vR;Ur gh vlqjf{kr gksxk & nks"kflf) vkSj ltk vikLr dh & vfHk;qDrksa dks lHkh vkjksiksa ls nks"keqDr fd;k & rqjUr fjgk djus ds funsZ'k fn;sA ¼in la[;k 20 ls 26½ vihysa Lohdkj dhA
Hon'ble RAFIQ, J.—All these appeals arise out of the common first information report being FIR No.343/1996 registered with Police Station Jawahar Nagar, Jaipur for offence u/Ss.307, 332, 353, 365, 395, 397, 324 IPC and Sections 3/25 and 4/25 of the Arms Act leading to conviction of the appellants in two separate trials. While first three of these appeals namely; D.B. Criminal Appeals No.709/2008, 634/2008 & 800/2008 are directed against the common judgment dated 31/05/2008 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track) No.2, Jaipur City, Jaipur in Sessions Case No.112/2001, fourth D.B. Criminal Appeal No.448/2011 is directed against the judgment dated 24/07/2008 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track) No.2, Jaipur City, Jaipur in Sessions Case No.48/2008 whereby, the accused-appellants were convicted and sentenced for the alleged offences, as under:-
(a) All the accused-appellants were convicted for offence u/S.395 IPC and were sentenced to life imprisonment alongwith fine of Rs.5,000/- and in default thereof, each one of them was sentenced to further undergo simple imprisonment for six months, convicted for offence u/S.332/149 IPC and were sentenced to simple imprisonment for three years alongwith fine of Rs.1,000/- and in default thereof, each one of them was sentenced to further undergo simple imprisonment for three months, convicted for offence u/S.353/149 IPC and were sentenced to simple imprisonment for two years alongwith fine of Rs.1,000/- and in default thereof, each one of them was sentenced to further undergo simple imprisonment for two months, convicted for offence u/S.365/149 IPC and were sentenced to simple imprisonment for seven years alongwith fine of Rs.2,000/- and in default thereof, each one of them was sentenced to further undergo simple imprisonment for six months.
(b) Accused-appellants Virendra @Mahaveer, Rahul @Ashish @Tulla and Ajay @Vijay were convicted for offence u/S.148 IPC and were sentenced to simple imprisonment for three years alongwith fine of Rs.1,000/- and in default thereof, each one of them was sentenced to further undergo simple imprisonment for three months.
(c) Accused-appellants Sandeep @Bittu, Deepak Chaudhary & Shyam @Shyam Kumar were convicted for offence u/S.147 IPC and were sentenced to simple imprisonment for two years alongwith fine of Rs.1,000/- and in default thereof, each one of them was sentenced to further undergo simple imprisonment for two months.
(d) Accused-appellants Rahul @Ashish @Tulla and Ajay @Vijay were convicted for offence u/S.4/25 of the Arms Act and were sentenced to simple imprisonment for one year alongwith fine of Rs.500/- and in default thereof, each one of them was sentenced to further undergo simple imprisonment for fifteen days.
(e) Accused-appellant Virendra @Mahaveer was convicted for offence u/S.3/25 of the Arms Act and was sentenced to simple imprisonment for two years alongwith fine of Rs.500/- and in default thereof, he was sentenced to further undergo simple imprisonment for fifteen days.
(f) Accused-appellant Devendra @Mama was acquitted from the charge of offence u/S.397 IPC.
(g) All the sentences were ordered to run concurrently.
2. The facts giving rise to these appeals are that a ‘parcha bayan’ of Home Guard-Ummed Singh was recorded on 21.9.1996 that he along with Police Constable-Laxminarayan was on surveillance duty in the night of 20-21.9.1996 in Ram Gali Nos.6 & 7 of Raja Park Colony of Jaipur. When they reached in front of ‘Appu Ghar’ at 3.30 a.m., they found a person standing in suspicious circumstances. Then they noticed two persons breaking shutter of ‘Look Fine Garments Store’. They challenged them. However, one of them took out a pistol and pointed at him (informant). Four-five persons suddenly came there and started beating him. One of them caught hold of him, whereas another put a pistol on his chest. They compelled him to sit in a blue Maruti Car. Other accused started beating Laxminarayan.
State of Uttar Pradesh vs. Punni & Ors. ((2008) 11 SCC 153) 8
M. Noohukan vs. Bank of Travancore & Anr. ((2008) 11 SCC 161) 8
Abdul Gafur & Ors. vs. State of Assam ((2007) 12 SCC 627) 8
Sitaram Sao alias Mungeri vs. State of Jharkhand ((2007) 12 SCC 630) 8
Suryamoorthi & Anr. vs. Govindaswamy & Ors. ((1989) 3 SCC 24) 17
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.