Hon'ble BISHNOI, J.—By the instant writ petition, the petitioner-plaintiff has challenged the order dated 24.10.2007 passed by the learned Additional District Judge (Fast Track) No.2, Bhilwara (for short 'the trial court' hereinafter) in Civil Original Suit No.80/2006, whereby the learned trial court has decided the Issue No.5A and held that the plaint was required to be presented with the court fees of Rs.50,45,520/- and directed the plaintiff to supply deficient court fee stamps within a month after adjustment of amount already paid towards the court fees.

2. The petitioner and the respondent No.5 have filed a suit in the trial court and stated that one Maheshwari Textile Mills, Bhilwara took a loan from the Rajasthan Financial Corporation (for short 'the RFC' hereinafter) for the purpose of establishing an industry. It is stated that the Maheshwari Textile Mills, Bhilwara was a registered partnership firm in which late Shri Om Prakash Pediwal was the partner along with two other persons and the loan for establishing the industry was obtained by the said partnership firm. It is further stated that on account of non-payment of loan amount, the industry was taken over by the RFC and later on, the same was sold and the amount received was adjusted by the RFC in the loan account. It is also stated that on account of death of Shri Om Prakash Pediwal, the partnership firm came to be dissolved but from the Branch Office of the RFC, the plaintiffs received a notice, whereby they were asked to deposit the loan amount of Rs.50,42,520/- within a period of fifteen days, to which they had submitted their reply through Registered Post stating therein that Shri Om Prakash Pediwal died without leaving any movable or immovable property and the plaintiff-respondents are not liable to repay the loan amount of the Maheshwari Textile Mills as they have nothing to do with the said industry and the same belonged to a partnership firm, which came to an end with the death of Shri Om Prakash Pediwal. It is further stated in the plaint that the respondent-RFC had illegally sent an award/demand notice to the Collector, on the basis of which, the Collector had issued a notice to them to repay the loan amount to the tune of Rs.50,42,520/-within fifteen days, and the plaintiffs are apprehending that on the basis of said demand, the Collector may attach the private property of the plaintiffs and, therefore, they had filed this plaint for declaration and permanent injunction. The relevant averments made in the plaint read as under:

^^3- ;g fd jktLFkku foÙk fuxe ds czkap dk;kZy; HkhyokM+k ls oknhx.k dks Lo- vkseizdk'k ds of/kd mÙkjkf/kdkjhx.k gksus ls og crkrs gq, ,d lwpuk i= vUrxZr /kkjk 32 cÙkhl th-,l-,Q-lh- ,DV fnukad 09-05-2006 uks ebZ nks gtkj N% dks jftLVMZ Mkd ls izkIr gqvk fd ekgs'ojh VsDlVkbZy feYl HkhyokM+k ds ftEesa _.k dh jkf'k dh cdk;k jkf'k 50]42]520@& ipkl yk[k fca;kyhl gtkj ikap lks chl :i;k cdk;k gS ftlds 15 iUnzg ;kse esa tek u djkus ij /kkjk 32 th-,l-,Q-lh- ,DV ds vUrxZr dk;Zokgh dh tkosxhA mä uksfVl dk tokc oknhx.k dh vksjls tfj;s jftLVMZ Mkd fnukad 15-05-2006 iUnzg ebZ nks gtkj N% dks izsf"kr dj fn;k fd vkseizdk'kth isMhoky tks QeZ esa Hkkxhnkj Fks] mudh e`R;q gks pqdh gS rFkk ekgs'ojh VsDlVkbZy feYl lk>snkjkQeZ ls oknhx.k dk dksbZ ysuknsuk ugha FkkA ;g Hkh lwfpr fd;k x;k fd Lo- vkseizdk'k isMhoky viuh e`R;q ds le; oknhx.k ds ikl mudh dksbZ py@vpy lEifÙk NksM+dj ugha x;s Fks vkSj u Lo- vkseizdk'kth isMhoky dh dksbZ py o vpy lEifÙk oknhx.k ds ikl gh gSA blfy, oknhx.k ekgs'ojh VsDlVkbZy feYl dh fdlh Hkh nsunkjh dh vnk;xh ds fy, ftEesnkj ugha gSA

4- ;g fd izfroknh Øe rhu }kjk Jh jftLVMZ Mkd ls ,d yhxy uksfVl ;g vafdr djrs gq, oknhx.k dks fnukad 6-6-2006 N^ twu nks gtkj N% dks Hkstk fd HkhyokM+k czkap ls vUrxZr /kkjk 32 th-,l-,Q-lh- ,DV oknhx.k dks izsf"kr fd;k tk pqdk gS mlds laca/k esa os dksbZ vkifÙk djuk pkgrs rks fnukad 20-06-2006 chl twu nks gtkj N% rd dj ldrs gSaA ftldk tokc oknhx.k dh vksj ls jftLVMZ Mkd ls fnukad 09 twu 2006 dks Hkst

Click Here to Read the rest of this document