KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA
H. D. F. C. Bank Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
2. Succinctly stated the facts of the instant petition are that the respondent/complainant No.2 (Rajendra Kumar) had approached the petitioner-bank to purchase two-wheeler vehicle i.e. Hero Honda Splender plus; and believing that the respondent/complainant is financially sound, an agreement was executed and the bank had extended loan on 17.02.2006 amounting to Rs.30,529/-. As per agreement, the respondent/ complainant was bound to pay the installments, as agreed on the stipulated date and after purchase, the vehicle was hypotheticated in favour of the petitioner-bank, as per Hire Purchase Agreement.
3. The case of the petitioner/bank is that the respondent/complainant had neither produced the vehicle for inspection nor paid the monthly installment and had ignored the repeated reminders to pay the amount outstanding.
4. It is th
Charanjit Singh Chadha & Ors. vs. Sudhir Mehta (AIR 2001 SC 3721) 13
K.A. Mathal @ Babu & Anr. vs. Kora Bibbikutty & Anr. ((1996) 7 SCC 212) 14
Trilok Singh & Ors. vs. Satya Deo Tripathi (AIR 1979 SC 850) 14
Bharath Metha vs. State by Inspector of Police Chennai (2008(2) Supreme 596) 16
Anup Sarmah vs. Bhola Nath Sharma & Ors. ((2013) 1 SCC 400) 19
Tarun Bhargava vs. State of Haryana & Anr. (2003(2) ARBLR 645) 25
Citicorp Maruti Finance Limited vs. S. Vijayalaxmi ((2012) 1 SCC 1) 28
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.