SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(P&H) 601

ADARSH KUMAR GOEL
Tarun Bhargava – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Judgment

Adarsh Kumar Goel, J.

1. This petition has been filed for quashing the FIR No.1237 dated 24.10.1997, under Sections 392/323/506/120-B of the Indian Penal Code (for short, the Code), Police Station City Gurgaon.

2. The above FIR was registered on a direction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. on a complaint filed by respondent No.2 (hereinafter referred to as the complainant), wherein it was stated that the complainant purchased a car for Rs.2,44,603/- through the accused petitioner (hereinafter referred to as the petitioner) In August, 1995 arid paid an initial amount of Rs.52.5M/- and paid 26 instalments of Rs.8944/- each amounting to Rs.2,32,544/- and though there was no default by the petitioner in the payment of instalments upto 20.10.1997, the petitioner alongwith others went to the place of the complainant and snatched the car from him by using a duplicate key which was with the accused. It is further slated that the complainant was the registered owner of the car and though he objected to the car being taken away, the petitioner used filthy language and pushed away the complainant and forcibly took away the car. It is also stated that the c



























































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top