SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Raj) 397

ARUN BHANSALI
Karnail Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
N.S. Acharya, for Petitioner;
J.S. Bhaleria, for Respondents

JUDGMENT :

Hon'ble BHANSALI, J.—These writ petitions are directed against the judgment dated 30.6.2014 passed by the Board of Revenue, Ajmer (`Board'), whereby while the appeal filed by the petitioner against the judgment dated 30.4.2013 passed by the Revenue Appellate Authority, Sriganganagar (`RAA') has been dismissed, the appeal filed by the respondent No. 4 Hardutt Singh against the same has been accepted.

2. The facts in brief as indicated by the petitioner in the writ petitions are that respondent No. 5 Narendra Kumar was recorded khatedar of land ad-measuring 13Bigha 15 Biswa situated at Village 2-E, Chhoti, Sriganganagar. Narendra Kumar entered into an agreement to sale dated 16.2.2010 favouring petitioner and respondent No. 4 Hardutt Singh for land admeasuring 2 Bigha 12 Biswa, Narendra Kumar executed a sale deed dated 7.5.2010 in favour of Hardutt Singh for land admeasuring 1 Bigha 6 Biswa from out of land comprised in agreement to sale dated 16.2.2010. Whereafter, Hardutt Singh filed a suit No. 55/2011 under Sections 53 & 88 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955 (`the Act') before Sub-Divisional Officer (`S.D.O.') against Narendra Kumar and the State seeking partition based o





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top