GOVIND PRASAD SHARMA vs STATE (EDUCATION DEPARTMENT)

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2015 Supreme(Raj) 555

AJAY RASTOGI, J.K.RANKA
GOVIND PRASAD SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
STATE (EDUCATION DEPARTMENT) – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For Petitioners: Mr.D.K.Bhardwaj, Mr.Amit Singh Shekhawat, Mr.Anshuman Saxena, Mr.Sumer Singh, Mr.Laxmi Kant Sharma, Mr.Sandeep Garssa, Mr.Kailash Sharma, Mr.Munesh Bhardwaj, Mr.G.S.Goutam, Mr.Balveer Singh Beniwal, Mr.Sanjay Mehla, Mr.Naveen Dhuwan, Mr.Ghanshyam Sharma, Mr.Ram Pratap Saini, Mr.Suresh Kumar, Mr.Jeetendra Kumar Sharma, Mr.Suresh Kumar, Mr.Ajay Rajawat, Mr.M.S.Raghav, Mr.Mohar Pal Meena, Mr.Dharmendra Barala, Mr.Satiesh Kumar, Mr.G.L.Sharma, Mr.Pradeep Kalwania, Mr.Vikash Jain, Mr.Rambabu Sharma, Mr.R.B.Sharma, Mr.Vinayak Joshi, Mr.Anurag Pareek, Mr.Anil Mahla, Mr.Gajender Sharma, Mr.Akhilesh Pareek, Mr.Kamlesh Pareek, Mr.Suman Sharma, Mr.Omveer Singh Saini, Mr.Tanveer Ahmed.
For Respondent-State:Mr.N.M.Lodha, Advocate General assisted by Mr.D.V.Tholia, Addl.Advocate General with Mr.Sheetanshu Sharma, Counsel for respondent-State.

JUDGMENT :

Ajay Rastogi, J.

In the instant batch of writ petitions, few of the petitioners have prayed to declare R.2(j) & R.16 & Schedule-I of the Rajasthan Vidhyalay Sahayak Subordinate Service Rules, 2015 (for short ‘the Rules, 2015’) and few of the petitioners have prayed to declare R.15(x) & R.25 of the Rules, ultra vires to the extent that it does not include the work experience gained by the petitioners as Prerak, Anganbari Worker, Mid Day Meal, Guest Faculty, Child Labour Projects and other categories of employment on daily wages, contract or temporary employment to be considered eligible and age relaxation in recruitment to the post of Vidhyalay Sahayak which is included in the Schedule-I appended to the Rules, 2015. The selection process has been initiated for recruitment for 30,522 posts of Vidhyalay Sahayak vide advertisement dt.21.07.2015 published by the Director (Elementary Education), Government of Rajasthan.

In the present batch of writ petitions, the petitioners have claimed similar reliefs in respect of alleged discrimination met out to them in excluding their experience and grant of relaxation in holding them ineligible to participate in the selection process init

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2015 Supreme(Raj) 555

AJAY RASTOGI, J.K.RANKAGOVIND PRASAD SHARMA – AppellantVersusSTATE (EDUCATION DEPARTMENT) – Respondent

Cases Referred (7)

AJAY RASTOGI, J.K.RANKA
GOVIND PRASAD SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
STATE (EDUCATION DEPARTMENT) – Respondent