SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Raj) 306

VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA
Aditi Bharti – Appellant
Versus
Om Prakash Vishnoi – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Sandeep Mathur
For the Respondents: Rishipal Agarwal

ORDER :

Veerendr Singh Siradhana, J.

The claimant-appellant wife of the deceased has instituted the instant appeal with a prayer for enhancement of the award dated 2nd June, 2010; made in her favour by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Ajmer (for short 'the Tribunal'), for the Tribunal wrongly applied the deduction to the extent of ?rd towards personal and living expenses. Further, adequate compensation has not been awarded under conventional heads: loss of consortium to the spouse, loss of love and affection (spouse), loss of care and guidance to children and funeral expenses.

2. Briefly, the skeletal material facts necessary for appreciation of the controversy involved in the present appeal seeking enhancement of the compensation are that deceased Anand Prakash Bharati was aged about 44 years, while he died in an accident, which occurred on 29th March, 2008. While he was driving his car bearing Registration Number RJ-06-CA-3455 with moderate speed, the offending truck bearing Registration Number RJ-19-1G-5387, driven in a rash and negligent manner and with excess speed, collided with the car of the deceased. On institution of the Motor Vehicle Accident Claim before the Tribunal; a




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top