IN THE HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN
Vineet Kothari, J.
Inder Singh - Appellant
Versus
Bheem Singh - Respondent
S.B. Civil First Appeal No. 221 of 2003
Decided on : 11-03-2016
Civil Procedure Code , 1908 - Order 8 - Rule 10 - Order 8 - Rule 5,1 - Evidence Act - Section 58 – Will - Suit property - Seeking requisite permission from concerned Gram Panchayat - Appellant/plaintiff, was in service of Central Cooperative Bank, and undisputedly, Patta was issued in respect of said plot of land by concerned Gram Panchayat-Dhariya, in name of plaintiff - Since, plaintiff/appellant was serving he gave permissive possession of part of said house to his younger brother, for a period of two years - Father of parties, , expired but before his death, he executed a Will in favour of his three sons, viz. two being parties to present suit and having no list in present case, was not a party to present suit, which was filed by appellant/plaintiff for seeking possession of suit house in question from defendant, and mesne profits – Held , In peculiar facts and circumstances of this case, legal representatives of respondent are granted three months time to vacate suit premises – They are further directed that after the expiry of the three months period, the vacant and peaceful possession of the suit property be handed over to appellant - Usual undertaking to this effect be filed by legal representatives of respondent in this Court within two weeks - Legal representatives of respondent are also directed to pay Rs. 1,00,000/- per month towards use and occupation of premises for a period of three months - Said amount for use and occupation be given to appellant on or before 10th of every month - In case legal representatives of respondent are not willing to pay amount for use and occupation as directed by this Court, they must hand over possession of premises within two weeks from date of this judgment - Thereafter, if legal representatives of respondent do not hand over peaceful possession of suit property, in that event, appellant would be at liberty to get possession of premises by taking police help - Appeal of appellant is allowed
Vineet Kothari, J.
This unfortunate fight between the two real brothers has been brought up before this Court by the appellant/plaintiff, Inder Singh S/o late Sh. Loonsingh Rajpurohit, against his younger brother, namely, Bheem Singh S/o late Sh. Loonsingh, in respect of suit property, a plot of land ad-measuring 21' x 54', situated in Village-Dhariya, Tehsil-Desuri, upon which the appellant/plaintiff constructed two rooms, one Hall, Chowk, Kitchen, store, bathroom, varanda, etc. after seeking requisite permission from the concerned Gram Panchayat.
2. The appellant/plaintiff, Inder Singh, was in service of Jodhpur Central Cooperative Bank, and undisputedly, the Patta No. 49/77 dated 19.06.1980 (Exhibit-2) was issued in respect of said plot of land by the concerned Gram Panchayat-Dhariya, in the name of plaintiff, Inder Singh. Since, the plaintiff/appellant was serving at Jodhpur, he gave permissive possession of the part of the said house to his younger brother, Bheem Singh, on 01.08.1996 for a period of two years. The father of the parties, late Sh. Loon Singh, expired on 27.03.2002 but before his death, he executed a Will on 17.12.1989 (Exhibit-1) in favour of his three sons, viz. two being parties to the present suit and other one Sh. Dalpat Singh. However, said brother, Dalpat Singh, having no lis in the present case, was not a party to the present suit, which was filed by the appellant/plaintiff for seeking possession of the suit house in question from the defendant, Bheem Singh and the mesne profits.
3. The learned trial court, however, vide the impugned judgment and decree dated 01.05.2003 rejected the suit filed by the plaintiff basically on two grounds, namely, that the plaintiff has failed to prove the Will (Exhibit-11) dated 17.12.1989 of the father, late Sh. Loon Singh, and also that the neighbourhood of the Patta (Exhibit-2) dated 19.06.1980 and as given in the Will and later on in the Notice revoking the licence of the defendant was different. The relevant portion of the trial court's order is quoted herein below for ready reference: -
fo}ku vf/koDrk oknh dh cgl lquhA i=koyh dk /;kuiwoZd voyksdu fd;k x;kA oknh bUnjflag ih0MCY;w0 1 us vius l'kiFk dFkuksa esa crk;k gS fd xzke <+kfj;k esa mldk jgoklh edku vk;k gqvk gSA mlds edku ds mRrj esa pSuflag dk edku gS] nf{k.k esa vke jkLrk gS] iwoZ esa y{e.kflag dk edku gS rFkk if'pe esa pSuflag dk edku gSA ;g edku 21 x 54 QhV ds uki ds IyksV ij cuk gqvk gSA edku dk uD'kk ,Xth0 1 gSA ,Xth0 1 uD'kk vCnqy djhc M~k~VeSu ls cuok;k FkkA bl IyksV ij igys mlds firkth us dCtk fd;k FkkA mlds firkth us iV~Vk bl IyksV ij esjs uke ls cuok;k Fkk tks ,Xth0 2 gS] bldh QksVks izfr ,Xth0 2&, gSA iV~Vk cuokdj esjs firkth us iapk;r ls izkIr fd;k Fkk ftlds izkIr gksus dh izekf.kr izfrfyfi ,Xth0 3 gSA bl ij esjs firkth ds , ls ch gLrk{kj gSA bl IyksV ij fuekZ.k dk;Z eSaus djok;k FkkA fuekZ.k dk;Z djokus gsrq xzke iapk;r <+kfj;k ls vuqefr izkIr dh FkhA eSaus esjs fu;ksDrk cSad tks/kiqj lsUV~y dks&vksijsfVo cSad tks/kiqj ls edku fuekZ.k djus gsrq _.k fy;k Fkk rFkk blds vykok esjs Lo;a ds lalk/kuksa ls jde tqVkdj fuekZ.k dk;Z djok;k FkkA edku ds fuekZ.k dk;Z esa 80000@& :i;s ykxr yxh FkhA _.k Lohd`fr vkns'k ,Xth0 4 gSA mlds ckn edku dh ejEer djokus ds fy, Hkh _.k fy;k Fkk ftldk vkns'k ,Xth0 5 gSA eSaus cSad ls tks _.k fy;k Fkk mldk pqdrk Hkqxrku dj fn;k Fkk ftldk uks M;wt izek.k i= ,Xth0 6 gSA bl edku esa fo|qr dusD'ku eSaus esjs uke ls fy;k Fkk ftlds fcy ,Xth0 7 ls 9 gSA esjs firkth yw.kflag dk nsgkUr fnukad 27-03-2002 dks gks x;k gSA esjs firkth us e`R;q ls iwoZ bPNk i= fu"ikfnr fd;k Fkk tks ,Xth0 11 gSA bPNk i= esjs :c: fd;k Fkk ftl ij , ls ch gLrk{kj esjs firkth yw.kflag us esjs le{k fd;s FksA bl ij lh ls Mh lk[k nsohflag us o bZ ls ,Q lk[k iksdjnkl us Mkyh FkhA ,Xth0 11 dks uksVjh ls lR;kfir djok;k FkkA bl bPNk i= ds vuqlkj oknxzLr edku esjs firkth us eq>s olh;r djus dh ?kks"k.kk dh FkhA esjs firkth ds thoudky rd ;g olh;rukek izHkkoh jgk FkkA eSa tks/kiqj esa o"kZ 1971 ls LFkk;h :i ls jg
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.