SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Raj) 530

VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA
Sarvan Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Rajkumar Saini – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Ram Sharan Sharma, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. N.L. Verma, Advocate.

ORDER :

Veerendr Singh Siradhana, J.

The claimant-appellants complaining of inadequacy in awarding just and reasonable compensation as contemplated under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988; while adjudicating upon their claim petition vide award dated 29th September, 2008; have approached this Court for enhancement of the award.

2. Briefly, the skeletal material facts necessary for adjudication of the controversy raised herein are that the claimant-appellants instituted a claim petition for the loss suffered by them on account of death of their son, namely, Sita Ram, in a road accident, which occurred on 9th October, 2007. It is pleaded case of the appellants that the deceased son was aged about 26 years and was earning an amount of Rs. 7,000/- per month out of the milk dairy. However, the Tribunal concluded the monthly income of the deceased as Rs. 3,000/- per month in absence of any material evidence to substantiate the claim of monthly income as Rs. 7,000/-. Applying the multiplier of 8 on the basis of the age of the dependent parents of the deceased, assessed the 'loss


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top