SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Raj) 529

P.K.LOHRA
Santosh Agarwal – Appellant
Versus
Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Anoopgarh – Respondent


Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants :B.M. Agarwal with Dr. M.S. Dhankanwar, Advocates.
For the Respondents:M.R. Pareek, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

P.K. Lohra, J.

Appellants-claimants have preferred this appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short 'the Act') to assail the impugned judgment and award dated 13.08.2001 passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Anoopgarh (for short 'the Tribunal') to the extent of amount of compensation awarded by the learned Tribunal. Essentially, the appellants are aggrieved by the findings and conclusion of learned Tribunal on issue No.2.

2. Bare necessary facts for the purpose of this appeal are that appellants laid a claim petition against the respondents under Section 140 and 166 of the Act for claiming compensation to the tune of Rs.14,91,000/- on account of death of Krishan Kumar Goyal @ Krishanlal in a motor accident caused by the vehicle of respondent-Corporation. In order to claim the aforesaid amount of compensation, appellants have pleaded requisite facts in the claim petition besides attributing negligence to the driver of the Corporation vehicle. In the return filed by the respondents, averments contained in the claim petition are disputed and






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top