Back
2016 Supreme(Raj) 513
IN THE HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN
Vineet Kothari, J.
Late Mohanlal through his LRs. - Appellants
Versus
Dharampal through his LRs. – Respondents
S.B. Civil Second Appeal No. 286 of 2004.
Decided On : 02-03-2016
For the Plaintiffs-Appellants-Landlord :Alkesh Agarwal, Advocate.
For the Defendants-Respondents-Tenant:T.S. Champawat, Advocate.
Headnote:
Civil Procedure Code , 1908 - Section 100 - Specific Relief Act, 1967 - Rajasthan Premises Act, 1950 - Section 13 - Suit for eviction filed by plaintiff-landlord inter alia on ground of default and bona fide need of landlord - Whether in view of issue having been decided in favour of defendant about conditional sale, courts below were justified in refusing decree for eviction on ground of bona fide necessity - Whether in absence of any pleading about bona fide necessity, suit for eviction can be decreed in favour of plaintiff – Held , Coming to merits of present case under rent control and eviction grounds, this Court finds perversity in impugned orders passed by learned courts below, writ large - Rent note itself executed way back on for Rs. 40/- per month stipulated that whenever suit premises are needed by landlord, tenant would give vacant possession of same to landlord - In face of these terms, once landlord comes to Court and pleads that suit house is required for his personal purposes or purposes of his family, and reiterates those averments in witness box before learned trial court, nothing more, as a matter of fact, remains to be done by him, and eviction decree is liable to be granted, on such grounds of bona fide need established by landlord - In present case, learned courts below have refused decree, finding that since rent note did not contain any stipulation for same, which is factually wrong premise, and that plaintiff did not reiterate his need in evidence led by him, which is also not borne out from statements recorded by learned trial court, which, as quoted in memo of appeal, are also quoted again here, for ready reference - Appeal allowed
Vineet Kothari, J.
The plaintiff-landlord-Mohanlal s/o Shri Juharmal Ji, who is now represented by his legal representatives, Smt. Nirmala w/o Late Mohanlal and others, has filed the present second appeal under Section 100 CPC in this Court on 26.02.2004 against the defendant-tenant-Dharampal s/o Shri Bhikhaji, in respect of the suit house in question situated at Takhatgarh, Tehsil Sumerpur, District Pali.
2. The suit for eviction filed by the plaintiff-landlord inter alia on the ground of default and bona fide need of the landlord, came to be dismissed by both the learned courts below, with the following findings and observations:-
Order dated 03.06.1995 of the learned trial court of Civil Judge (Junior Division), Sumerpur, District Pali in Civil Original Suit No. 101/79 - Mohanlal v. Dharampal:-
rudh la[;k nks&bl rudh dks lkfcr djus dk Hkkj oknh ij Fkk tks rudh la[;k nks fuEu izdkj gS%
D;k oknxzLr ifjlj dh oknh dks O;fDrxr ,oa ;qfDr;qDr ln~HkkoiwoZd vko';drk gS\
bl laca/k esa fo}ku vf/koDrk oknh dk rdZ gS fd oknxzLr ifjlj dh oknh dks vius o vius ifjokj ds mi;ksx gsrq ;qfDr;qDr :i ls rFkk ln~HkkoiwoZd fuft vko';drk gS vkSj blh mn~ns'; ls oknh us mDr ifjlj [kjhn fd;k FkkA fo}ku vf/koDrk oknh dk ;g Hkh rdZ gS fd xokg ih0M0&1&oknh eksguyky us vius c;kuksa esa ;g dFku fd;k gS fd edku eq>s jgus ds fy;s pkfg;sA esjs firkth ds 4 yM+ds gSa] nks 'kknh'kqnk gSA ;g edku eSaus jgus ds fy;s [kjhnk FkkA vHkh eSa esjs nwljs HkkbZ;ksa ds lkFk jgrk gwWa rFkk xokg ih0M0&2 &ikjley us vius c;kuksa esa ;g dFku fd;k gS fd esjs firkth dks xqtjs 10&12 lky gks x;s gSaA esjs firkth ds 4 yM+ds gSaA lcls cM+k eksguyky] fQj paikyky] rhljs uEcj ij enuyky o pkSFks uEcj ij eSa gwWaA ekrkth ftUnk gSA esjs firkth ds nks edku gSaA nks edkuksa esa eSa o esjs HkkbZ enuyky rFkk esjh cgu o ekrk nksuksa edkuksa esa lkFk jgrs gSaA eksguyky o paikyky lkaxk okyh xyh esa fdjk;s ij jgrs gSaA /keZiky us eksguyky ls edku fdjk;s [kjhnk FkkA eksguth dks edku dh vko';drk gS D;ksafd ;s fdjk;s ij jg jgs gSaA eksguth ds nks yM+ds o nks yM+fd;kWa gSaA vc ge lHkh HkkbZ vyx jgrs gSaA mijksDr lk{; ls ;g lkfcr ekuk tkos fd oknh dks oknxzLr ifjlj dh futh ,oa ;qfDr;qDr vko';drk gSA vr% bl rudh dk fu.kZ; oknh ds i{k esa fu.khZr fd;k tkosA
fo}ku vf/koDrk izfroknh dk rdZ gS fd oknh us vius okn esa dFku fd;k gS fd mlus jgus ds fy;s fooknxzLr edku dks [kjhnk Fkk rFkk vij ftyk U;k;ky;] ckyh ds ewy okn dk izn'kZ ,&1 jftLVMZ fodz;&i= esa izfroknh /keZiky fodzsrk us ;g jftLV~MZ fodz;&i= esa edku dk dCtk oknh dks lqiqnZ dj nsus dk dFku fd;k gS tks fodz;&i= nksuksa i{kksa ds e/; Lohd`r nLrkost gS ftlds vuqlkj oknh us edku dk dCtk izkIr dj fy;k Fkk ysfdu mlh fnu fdjk;k fpV~Bh ds {kjk fookfnr ifjlj izfroknh dks fdjk;s ij ns fn;k x;k ftlls oknh dk ;g dFku xyr lkfcr gksrk gS fd oknxzLr ifjlj dks mlus Lo;a ds jgus ds fy;s [kjhn fd;k gks rFkk Lo;a eksguyky us viuh eq[; ijh{kk esa ;g dFku dgha Hkh ugha fd;k fd eSa fdjk;s ds edku esa jgrk gwWaA oknh xokg ih0M0&1&eksguyky us vius eq[; c;ku esa ;g dgk gS fd eSa esjs nwljs HkkbZ;ksa ds lkFk jgrk gwWa tcfd xokg ih0M0&2&ikjley us oknh eksguyky dks fdjk;s ds edku esa jgus dk dFku fd;k gS tks loZFkk xyr lkfcr gks tkrk gS blfy;s mDr rudh dk fu.kZ; oknh ds fo:) fu.khZr fd;k tkosA
eSaus ekuuh; vij ftyk U;k;k/kh'k] ckyh ds U;k;ky; dh ewy i=koyh ds izn'kZ 1&, dk voyksdu fd;k ftlesa fodzsrk us edku dk dCtk lqiqnZ dj fn;s tkus dk dFku fd;k gS ftlls ;g izrhr gksrk gS fd oknh us edku dks dz; djrs le; fnukad 19-11-1975 dks dCtk izkIr dj fy;k ysfdu mlh fnu tfj;s fdjk;kukek izn'kZ&1 oknh }kjk izfroknh dks fookfnr edku fdjk;s ij ns fn;k x;k ftlls oknh dk ;g dFku lansgiw.kZ gks tkrk gS fd mlus fookfnr edku dks Lo;a ds jgus ds fy, [kjhnk gksA blds vykok oknh Lo;a eksguyky us vius c;kuksa esa dgha Hkh ;g dFku ugha fd;k fd og paikyky] ikjley ds ;gka lkaxk xyh esa fdjk;s ij jgrk gS tcfd ih0M0&2& ikjley tks oknh dk HkkbZ gS mlus vius c;kuksa esa oknh ds fdjk;s ds edku esa jgus dk dFku fd;k gS tks c;ku fojks/kkHkklh gSA oknh us ftjg esa ;g Lohdkj fd;k gS fd fdjk;kfpV~Bh fnukad 19
