SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Raj) 931

SANDEEP MEHTA
Badri Ram S/o Shri Fata Ram – Appellant
Versus
Board of Revenue for Rajasthan, Ajmer – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : MR. RJ PUNIA
For the Respondent: MR. SM PARIHAR

ORDER :

1. By way of this writ petition, the petitioners herein have approached this Court for assailing the order (Annex.10) dated 4.8.2016 passed by the Board of Revenue Ajmer rejecting as not maintainable, the revision preferred by the petitioners against the order (Annex.9) dated 10.1.2014 issued by the Tehsildar Gudamalani requisitioning Police aid to evict the petitioners from the khatedari land belonging to the respondents in the village Mukhawa.

2. Undisputed facts as available on record reveal that the respondents No.3 to 11 being members of Scheduled Caste community filed a revenue suit under Section 188 and 183 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act before the Assistant Collector and prayed that the petitioners herein may be directed not to interfere in the possession and cultivation of the respondents on the khatedari land belonging to them. The suit was dismissed in default. However, later on, an application filed by the respondents before the Tehsildar concerned under Section 183 of the Tenancy Act came to be allowed on 28.7.1993 and it was directed that the petitioners be evicted from the land in question and the possession thereof be restored to the respondents No.3 to 11 bein














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top