GOVIND MATHUR, KAILASH CHANDRA SHARMA
Hindustan Zinc Limited – Appellant
Versus
Rajasthan Electricity Regulatory Commission, Jaipur – Respondent
Govind Mathur, J.
These petitions for writ are before us to examine constitutional validity of the regulations 17, 21(1), 25, 26(3), 26(6), 26(7)(i), 26(7)(ii), 26(7)(iii), 26(7)(v) and 26(8) of the Rajasthan Electricity Regulatory Commission (Terms and Conditions for Ope Access) Regulations, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Regulations of 2016').
2. Before coming to the facts and the issues under adjudication, it would be appropriate to mention introductory details about the Indian Electricity Act 2003 and the concept of "open access" incorporated therein. The provisions of the Act of 2003 and the concept of open access enshrined in it is a very ambitious step of the legislature to promote the entire electricity sector with a view to have progressive reforms to benefit industrial consumers, private utilities, power equipment providers etc.
3. The parliament enacted the Act of 2003 to consolidate the laws relating to generation, transmission, distribution, trading and use of electricity and generally for taking measures conducive to development of electricity industry,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.