Important Point - Evidence is enough to indicate that prosecution has succeeded in establishing and proving its case beyond all the realms of suspicion with a positive testimony.

Moolchandani, J.

This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 04.07.2016 passed by Sessions Judge, Rajsamand in Sessions Case No.84/2014 (CIS No.262/2014) by which learned trial court has convicted the appellant-accused under Sections 5(N)/6 of the Prevention of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (for short ‘the POCSO Act’) for life imprisonment with a fine of Rs.5000/-, in default further to undergo five months’ simple imprisonment.

2. The First Information Report disclosing the factual aspect of the offence reads as under:-

^^lsok esa]

Jheku Fkkukf/kdkjh th

iqfyl Fkkuk jktuxj

ftyk jktleUn] ¼jkt-½

izkFkhZ;k & ikjlh lkyoh firk ghjkyky lkyoh mez 14 o”kZ fuoklh eksjp.kk rglhy ,oa ftyk jktleUnA

fo”k; & dk;Zokgh ckcr~A

egksn;th]

mi;qZDr fo”k; esa esjk fuosnu gS fd eSa jktdh; mPp izkFkfed fo|ky; xk¡o eksjp.kk esa d{kk 8 i<+rh gw¡A esjh tUe fnukad 4&3&2000 gSA bl f’k{k.k laLFkk esa d{kk 3 ls v/;;ujr gw¡A esjh lxh ek¡ pk¡nh ckbZ fiNys dbZ o”kksZa ls ukrk fookg xk¡o lasxuok esa dj fy;k gSA bl otg ls eSa esjs lxs firk ghjkyky lkyoh S/o nykth fuoklh eksjp.kk ds lkFk o”kZ 2008 ls lkFk jg jgh gw¡A esjh lkSrsyh ek¡ iq”ik ckbZ lkyoh o blds ,d yM+dk x.ks’k mez 11 ekg o ,d yM+dh dkty mez 6 o”kZ Hkh ,d gh dejs esa jgrs gSaA eSa d{kk 5 esa i<+rh Fkh rc ls vc rd esjs firk ghjkykyth }kjk djhcu 2&2 1@2 o”kZ igys fnu esa eSa ?kj eksjp.kk ij vdsyh FkhA vkSj esjs firkth Hkh ?kj ij FksA esjh ek¡ mlds ihgj xk¡o Q¡wfd;k xbZ gqbZ Fkh rc esjs lkFk ,dkUr ns[kdj esjk itkek [kqyok;k vkSj dgk fd rsjs is’kkc dh txg o vkl&ikl cky D;ksa mx jgs gSaA fQj eq>s uhps lqyk fy;kA vkSj eq>s Mjk /kedkdj eq>ls [kksVk dke dj fy;k bl nkSjku esjs is’kkc dh txg ls [kwu fudyk vkSj nnZ Hkh gqvk rks dgk fd pqipki lkQ dj ysA vkSj eq>s Mjk;k vkSj /kedk;k fd fdlh dks ugha dgsxhA blds ckn ge ekpZ&vizsy 2014 esa ,d ‘kknh esa cksjt x, tgk¡ jkLrs esa ,dkUr esa cuh dksBjh esa ys tkdj esjs lkFk tcju [kksVk dke fd;kA xro”kZ esjh lkSrsyh ek¡ gksyh ij mlds Hkrhtk gksus ls <q¡< ysdj ihgj xk¡o Qw¡fd;k xbZ Fkh rc Hkh eksjp.kk esa ?kj ij vdsyh ikdj jkr esa esjs lkFk [kksVk dke fd;kA vkSj esjs dks Mjk;k&/kedk;kA vkSj dgha ikl&iM+kSl fj’rsnkjh esa Hkh ugha tkus fn;kA ,d ckj esjh lxh ek¡ ls feykus ds fy, lasxokl xk¡o ysdj x, rks Hkh jkLrs esa ,dkUr txg ns[kdj va/ksjs esa eksVj lkbZfdy jksddj fQj [kksVk dke fd;kA xrekg 6 ;k 7 tqykbZ 14 dks jktuxj Ldwy dh dkWfi;ksa fnykus ds fy, ysdj vk, rks Hkh /kksyh [kku dh rjQ ,dkUr esa cuh ,d dksBM+h esa ys tkdj [kksVk dke fd;k bl ?kVukØe ls esjs dkQh ;kSu ¼’kkjhfjd½ mRihM+u gqvk gSA iM+kslh gtkjh yky lkyoh ls eSaus mldk eksckby Qksu ekax dj esjh lxh ek¡ pk¡nh ckbZ dks Hkh bl ?kVuk dh tkudkjh nhA ftl ij esjh ek¡ us dgk fd rw rsjs ikik dks cksydj esjs ikl vktk ukA rks esjs ikik us eq>s esjh lxh ek¡ ds ikl ugha tkus fn;kA esjs lkFk gks jgs ‘kkjhfjd vR;kpkj dk dksbZ lek/kku ugha fudyk rks eSaus esjs Ldwy dh efgyk f’kf{kdkvksa Jherh laxhrk tks’kh] Jherh gsedkark ikyhoky] Jherh utek [kkrwu ,oa Jherh ikjl d¡oj dks Hkh ?kVuk ds ckjs esa crk;kA eq>s dk;Zokgh gsrq jktuxj ysdj vk,A fjiksZV djrh gw¡A dk;Zokgh djkuk QjekosA

izkfFkZ;k

ikjlh lkyoh

fnukad % 6&8&14**

3. Heard submissions of both the sides learned Amicus Curiae representing the appellant has submitted that allegations regarding rape are wrong, in fact, the prosecutrix was disobeying command of her parents and she was instructed to mend her behaviour and not to nurture unwanted relationship with vagabond elements, which was not endured by the prosecutrix and in retaliation, she lodged a bogus FIR to harass her father. It has further been argued that the prosecutrix got admitted directly in the third standard and she was not a minor at the time of alleged offence so, provisions relating to POCSO Act does not attract in this case and the trial court ignored this aspect, which was agitated before the trial court but without paying any heed to the legal contentions, the trial was conducted. All the witnesses are hearsay and the FIR has also been lodged belatedly by two days, in a well thought way. The finding