Arun Bhansali, J.

1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 10.8.2016 passed by the Additional District Judge No. 2, Udaipur, whereby the application filed by the respondent No. 1 under Order 39, Rule 1 & 2 CPC has been partly accepted and appellants as well as respondents No. 2 to 5 have been restrained from transferring or creating encumbrance on the suit property without permission of the Court. However, the application qua respondents No. 6 to 12 has been rejected.

2. The respondent No. 1 - Smt. Laxmi Mehta filed a suit for partition and permanent injunction against the appellants and respondents No. 2 to 12 inter-alia with the averments that she along with appellants and respondents No. 1 to 4 were legal representatives of Late Prakash Mal Chatur; one Late Roshan Lal Chatur had three sons namely Manohar Lal, Parshavachand and Prakashmal; Manohar Lal had no issue, Parshavachand had two sons and Prakashmal had eight children; Late Roshan Lal Chatur had lot of properties, which remained in his possession and ownership during his life time, who died in February, 1962, the properties left by him remained joined; Prakashmal married Smt. Sugan Kanwar, who was mother of