SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Raj) 1096

PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI, PRADEEP NANDRAJOG
Amar Chand Sani s/o Shri Bheru Lal Sani – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocate Appeared:
For the Applicant :Mr. Mahesh Thanvi and Mr. Bharat Dutt Sharma, Advocates
For the Respondent:Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Pradeep Nandrajog, J.

1. Challenge in the four captioned appeals is to a common order dated April 1, 2010 granting relief in two Writ Petitions No.4902/2004 and 4913/2004 to the writ petitioners. The State of Rajasthan is aggrieved by the decision and so are the appellant Amar Chand and others who were not impleaded as respondents in the two writ petitions.

2. The grievance of the writ petitioners was to the Recruitment Rule for the post of Assistant Director(Junior)/Secretary Marketing Committee prescribing a minimum educational qualification for being promoted to said post. Granting relief to the writ petitioners the learned Single Judge has taken the view that since the educational qualification prescribed was not prescribed for the feeder cadre post, the writ petitioners were denied right to be promoted which violated Article 14 of the Constitution of India.

3. Relevant facts would be that the cadre comprises the post of a Marketing Supervisor at the base. The promotional post is that of a Junior Marketing Officer/Secretary Market Committees. The Recruitment Rule f












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top