SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Raj) 577

PRAKASH GUPTA
Vidushi Garg – Appellant
Versus
Gauri Sales – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.P. Khandelwal, Sudesh Bansal.

JUDGMENT AND ORDER :

Prakash Gupta, J.

1. Present first appeal is directed against the order dated 28.10.2017 passed by Additional District & Session Judge, No. 7, Jaipur Metropolitan, Jaipur whereby the trial court allowed the application filed by the defendants under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC and rejected the plaint under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC.

2. Brief facts giving rise to this appeal are that the appellant-plaintiff filed a suit for recovery of Rs. 20 lacs and interest accrued thereon. In the plaint, it is stated that defendants-respondents took a loan vide cheque dated 18.02.2013 which was encashed on 23.02.2013 with an assurance and agreement that the same would be returned after 1-2 months. It is also stated in the plaint that the defendants did not return the aforesaid loan amount within the stipulated period despite several requests made by the plaintiff. Ultimately a legal notice was sent to the defendants on 17.08.2013, asking them to pay the loan amount. The same was replied by the defendants denying the said amount to be a loan.

3. The defendants resisted the suit by filing

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top