K.S.JHAVERI, VIJAY KUMAR VYAS
Rajendra Kumar Parmarthak – Appellant
Versus
Central Administrative Tribunal Jaipur Bench Jaipur – Respondent
1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has assailed the judgment and order of the Central Administrative Tribunal whereby tribunal has dismissed the review application as well as original application filed by the applicant-petitioner herein.
2. The facts of the case are that the petitioner was appointed on the post of LDC on 12.1.1983 and within a very short span of time in 5 years, he has shown his colour for which he was issued charge sheet alleging that he received double payment of salary from two different places since August, 1996 to January 1997. The Inquiry Officer was appointed, who after conducting the inquiry arrived at the finding that charges against the petitioner were proved. The disciplinary authority imposed the penalty of dismissal which was confirmed by the appellate authority as well as tribunal.
3. Counsel for the petitioner Mr. Sharma has taken us to para no.7 of the petition which reads as under:-
7. Recovery from pay of the whole or part of any pecuniary loss caused by a Railway servant to the Government or Railway Administration by negligence or breach of orders-It is open to the competent authority to inflict in addition to the penalty of recovery
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.