2018 Supreme(Raj) 1076
IN THE HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN
ARUN BHANSALI, J.
Puran Mal - Appellant
Vs.
State of Rajasthan - Respondent
Civil Writ No. 12982 of 2018, 13743 of 2018, 13792 of 2018
Decided On : 19-09-2018
Tanwar Singh Rathore, Adv., Vikram Singh Bhati, Adv., Deepika Purohit, Adv., P.R. Singh, Adv.
The eligibility criteria for the post of Teacher Gr.III (Level-II) is governed by the NCTE Regulations, which prescribe a minimum of 50% marks in graduation and 1-year Bachelor in Education (B.Ed.) or 45% marks in graduation and 1-year B.Ed., in accordance with the NCTE (Recognition Norms and Procedure) Regulations. The Division Bench judgment in Sushil Sompura v. State (Education) and Others laid down cut-off dates for the application of the minimum marks requirement: 27.09.2007 and 31.08.2009. Candidates who have obtained less than 50% marks in graduation and have taken admission in B.Ed. course after 31.08.2009 are ineligible for the post of Teacher Gr. III (Level-II).
Headnote:
EDUCATION - TEACHER RECRUITMENT - ELIGIBILITY - NCTE REGULATIONS - MINIMUM MARKS REQUIREMENT - CUT-OFF DATES - EX-SERVICEMEN RELAXATION - INTERPRETATION AND APPLICATION: 1. The qualification for Teacher Gr.III (Level-II) is governed by the National Council for Teacher Education (NCTE) Regulations, as incorporated into the Rules of Panchayati Raj Rules, 1996. 2. The NCTE Regulations prescribe a minimum of 50% marks in graduation and 1-year Bachelor in Education (B.Ed.) or 45% marks in graduation and 1-year B.Ed., in accordance with the NCTE (Recognition Norms and Procedure) Regulations. 3. The Division Bench judgment in Sushil Sompura v. State (Education) and Others laid down cut-off dates for the application of the minimum marks requirement: 27.09.2007 and 31.08.2009. 4. Candidates who have obtained less than 50% marks in graduation and have taken admission in B.Ed. course after 31.08.2009 are ineligible for the post of Teacher Gr. III (Level-II). 5. The 5% relaxation in minimum marks for ex-servicemen under Rule 18-A of the Rajasthan Civil Services (Absorption of Ex-servicemen) Rules, 1998 applies only to competitive examinations and not to minimum eligibility criteria at graduation. 6. Petitioners who have less than 50% marks in graduation and have taken admission in B.Ed. course after 31.08.2009 are ineligible for the post of Teacher Gr. III (Level-II) and are not entitled to any relief.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners, who applied for the post of Teacher Gr.III (Level II) in the Rajasthan Primary and Upper Primary School Teacher Direct Recruitment 2018, challenged the rejection of their candidature due to not meeting the eligibility criteria. The petitioners, Puran Mal, Dharmendra Kumar Sharma, and Raveendra Singh, had obtained less than 50% marks in graduation and had taken admission in B.Ed. course after 31.08.2009. They argued that the prescription of minimum 50% marks at graduation level was not justified once they had obtained a degree of B.Ed. and that the NCTE Regulations provided for 45% marks at graduation level as one of the eligibility criteria. Dharmendra Kumar Sharma and Raveendra Singh, who were ex-servicemen, also claimed entitlement to a 5% relaxation in the minimum marks prescribed for eligibility.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that the qualification for Teacher Gr.III (Level-II) was governed by the NCTE Regulations, as incorporated into the Rules of Panchayati Raj Rules, 1996. The court further held that the NCTE Regulations prescribed a minimum of 50% marks in graduation and 1-year Bachelor in Education (B.Ed.) or 45% marks in graduation and 1-year B.Ed., in accordance with the NCTE (Recognition Norms and Procedure) Regulations. The court also held that the Division Bench judgment in Sushil Sompura v. State (Education) and Others laid down cut-off dates for the application of the minimum marks requirement: 27.09.2007 and 31.08.2009. The court concluded that candidates who have obtained less than 50% marks in graduation and have taken admission in B.Ed. course after 31.08.2009 are ineligible for the post of Teacher Gr. III (Level-II). The court also held that the 5% relaxation in minimum marks for ex-servicemen under Rule 18-A of the Rajasthan Civil Services (Absorption of Ex-servicemen) Rules, 1998 applies only to competitive examinations and not to minimum eligibility criteria at graduation.
Issues: 1. Whether the prescription of minimum 50% marks at graduation level was justified for candidates who had obtained a degree of B.Ed.? 2. Whether the NCTE Regulations provided for 45% marks at graduation level as one of the eligibility criteria? 3. Whether ex-servicemen were entitled to a 5% relaxation in the minimum marks prescribed for eligibility?
Ratio Decidendi: 1. The court held that the prescription of minimum 50% marks at graduation level was justified for candidates who had obtained a degree of B.Ed., as the NCTE Regulations prescribed a minimum of 50% marks in graduation and 1-year Bachelor in Education (B.Ed.) or 45% marks in graduation and 1-year B.Ed., in accordance with the NCTE (Recognition Norms and Procedure) Regulations. 2. The court held that the NCTE Regulations provided for 45% marks at graduation level as one of the eligibility criteria, but this was subject to the cut-off dates laid down in the Division Bench judgment in Sushil Sompura v. State (Education) and Others: 27.09.2007 and 31.08.2009. 3. The court held that ex-servicemen were not entitled to a 5% relaxation in the minimum marks prescribed for eligibility, as the 5% relaxation under Rule 18-A of the Rajasthan Civil Services (Absorption of Ex-servicemen) Rules, 1998 applies only to competitive examinations and not to minimum eligibility criteria at graduation.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the writ petitions filed by the petitioners, holding that they were ineligible for the post of Teacher Gr. III (Level-II) as they had obtained less than 50% marks in graduation and had taken admission in B.Ed. course after 31.08.2009.
Arun Bhansali, J.
These writ petitions have been filed by the petitioners aggrieved by rejection of their candidature for the post of Teacher Gr.III (Level II) in the Rajasthan Primary and Upper Primary School Teacher Direct Recruitment 2018.
2. The petitioner Puran Mal applied for the subject English and petitioners Dharmendra Kumar Sharma and Raveendra Singh applied for the subject Social Science. In addition, petitioners Dharmendra Kumar Sharma and Raveendra Singh are ex-servicemen as well. The status of percentage in graduation and date of admission in B.Ed. course of the petitioners are as under:-
Name
Percentage in Graduation
Date of admission in B.Ed. Course
Puran Mal
49.388%
20.11.2014
Dharmendra Kumar Sharma
45.444%
24.09.2014
Raveendra Singh
49.555%
07.08.2014
3. The provisions of Rule 266 of the Rules of Panchayati Raj Rules, 1996 ('the Rules of 1996'), insofar as relevant, provides the following:-
| Level-(ii) Class VI to VIII | Qualifications as laid down by the National Council for Teacher Education under the provisions of sub-section (1) of section 23 of the Right of Children to free and Compulsory Education Act 2009 (Central Act. No.35 of 2009), from time to time. |
4. In the advertisement issued by the respondents, the qualification, insofar as relevant, is indicated as under:-
"Graduation and 2-year Diploma in Elementary Education (by whatever name known).
or
Graduation with at least 50% marks and 1-year bachelor in Education (B.Ed.).
or
Graduation with at least 45% marks and 1-year Bachelor in Education (B.Ed), in accordance with the NCTE (Recognition Norms and Procedure) Regulations issued from time to time in this regard."
5. Besides the above, under Clause 9.3 and 9.4 following has been indicated:-
^^9-3 ekuuh; jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky;] tks/kiqj dh [k.MihB }kjk fofHkUu ;kfpdkvksa es ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukad 20-05-2011 ds Øe es Ldwy f'k{kk foHkkx] jktLFkku ds i=akd ,Q 7¼1½ bZ-@Iyku@2011 fnukad 17 twu] 2011 ,oa Li"Vhdj.k fnukad 16-09-2013 ds vuqlkj fuEu vH;FkhZ jktLFkku izkFkfed ,oa mPp izkFkfed v/;kid lh/kh HkrhZ] 2018 esa Hkkx ysus gsrq ik= gksaxs&
¼1½ ,sls lHkh vH;FkhZ ftUgksusa jk"Vªh; v/;kid f'k{kk ifj"kn dh vf/klwpuk fnaukd 27-09-2007 tkjh gksus ls iwoZ f'k{kd izf'k{k.k ikB~;Øeksa esa izos'k fy;k gS] mUgs Lukrd Lrj ;k led{k ijh{kk esa U;wure izfr'kr vad izkIr gksus dh ck/;rk ugha gSA
¼2½ ,sls lHkh vH;FkhZ ftUgksusa jk"Vªh; v/;kid f'k{kk ifj"kn dh vf/klwpuk fnukad 27-9-2007 tkjh gksus ds ckn ijUrq vf/klwpuk fnukad 31-08-2009 ds tkjh gksus ls iwoZ f'k{kd izf'k{k.k ikB~;Øeksa esa izos'k ys fy;k Fkk mUgsa Lukrd Lrj ;k led{k ijh{kk esa U;wure 45 izfr'kr vad izkIr gksus dh ck/;rk gSA
¼3½ ,sls lHkh vH;FkhZ ftUgksusa jk"Vªh; v/;kid f'k{kk ifj"kn dh vf/klwpuk fnukad 31-8-2009 ds tkjh gksus ds ckn f'k{kd izf'k{k.k ikB~;Øeksa es izos'k ys fy;k Fkk] mUgs Lukrd Lrj ;k led{k ijh{kk esa U;wure 50 izfr'kr vad izkIr gksus dh ck/;rk gSA
9-4 fcUnq la[;k 9-1 esa of.kZr 'kS{kf.kd ;ksX;rkvksa ds ekin.Mks esa vuqlwfpr tkfr@vuqlwfpr tutkfr@vU; fiNM+k oxZ@vfr fiNM+k oxZ@fo'ks"k ;ksX;tu oxZ ds vH;fFkZ;ksa ds fy, fu/kkZfjr vgZd vadks esa fu;ekuqlkj 5 izfr'kr vad dh NwV ns; gksxhA ekuuh; jktLFkku mPPk U;k;ky;] tks/kiqj }kjk ,lch flfoy fjV la[;k 10182@2012 jktjkuh cuke jktLFkku jkT; o vU; esa ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 10-10-2012 dh ikyuk esa lkekU; oxZ dh fo/kok@ifjR;drk efgykvksa dks U;wure 'kSf{kd vgZrkvksa esa 5 izfr'kr vad NwV ds lac/k esa jkT; ljdkj }kjk nk;j Mhch flfoy fjV la[;k 1022@2013 esa mPp U;k;ky; jktLFkku }kjk ikfjr fu.kZ; ds v/;/khu mudk dsoy p;u gksxk fdUrq gksxk vfUre fu.kZ; gksus rd mudh fu;qfDr ugha dh tkosxhA^^
6. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the prescription of minimum 50% marks at graduation level is not justified once the petitioners have obtained degree of B.Ed. Further submissions have been made that the NCTE Regulations p