PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, SANGEET LODHA, ARUN BHANSALI
Gulab Kothari, Editor, Rajasthan Patrika, Jaipur – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
Sangeet Lodha, J.
In the instant writ petitions, vide order dated 12.1.17, a Division Bench of this court consisting of two of us (Justice Sangeet Lodha and Justice Arun Bhansali) while deciding the issues arising for consideration, issued various directions to the respondents. However, a few issues remained pending adjudication for want of further details and accordingly, the respondents were directed to furnish the requisite details. The matters were directed to be listed for perusal of the compliance report and further orders.
2. There after, the matters were listed before the Division Bench on 29.5.17. After due consideration of the compliance reports submitted by the State Government and various Development Authorities as also the material placed on record by the petitioners and learned Amicus Curiae, further directions were issued from time to time.
3. On mention being made by Mr. Rajesh Panwar, Additional Advocate General, these matters were listed before the Division Bench on 20.3.18 in ‘To be mentioned’ category. Learned AAG brought to the notice of the Court that vide order dated 15.3.18 passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the SLPs (Nos. 19219- 19223/2017) prefe
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.